Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33622960›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2021

Pragmatic, double-blind, randomised trial evaluating the impact of red blood cell donor sex on recipient mortality in an academic hospital population: the innovative Trial Assessing Donor Sex (iTADS) protocol.

Dean A Fergusson, Michael Chassé, Alan Tinmouth, Jason P Acker, Shane English, Alan J Forster, Steven Hawken, Nadine Shehata, Kednapa Thavorn, Kumanan Wilson and 5 more

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03344887 phase4unknown statusnot on this map

An Innovative Trial Assessing Donor Sex on Recipient Mortality (iTADS)

TypeinterventionalSponsorOttawa Hospital Research InstituteRan2018 to 2022Enrolled8,850ConditionsRed Blood Cell TransfusionArmsRBC Transfusion from male donor, RBC Transfusion from female donor
NCT06840756 phase4recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Effects of Donor-recipient Sex-matched Versus Sex-mismatched Red Blood Cell Transfusion on Outcomes in Critically Ill Adult Patients

TypeinterventionalSponsorMichelle ZellerRan2025 to 2029Enrolled11,082ConditionsRed Blood Cell Transfusions, Sex Differences, Health Services, Critically Ill Intensive Care Unit PatientsArmsSex-mismatched red blood cell transfusions, Sex-matched red blood cell transfusions
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Dean A Fergusson *Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada dafergusson@ohri.ca.ORCID 0000-0002-3389-2485
Michael Chassé *Department of Medicine, Division of Critical Care, University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Alan TinmouthClinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Jason P AckerCenter for Innovation, Canadian Blood Services, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Shane EnglishClinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Alan J ForsterClinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Steven HawkenClinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Nadine ShehataPathology and Laboratory Medicine, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Kednapa ThavornClinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Kumanan WilsonClinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Angie TuttleClinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Iris PerelmanClinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Nancy CoberEastern Ontario Regional Laboratory Association, Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Heather MaddisonEastern Ontario Regional Laboratory Association, Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Melanie TokessyEastern Ontario Regional Laboratory Association, Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Ottawa Hospital · CAUniversity of Ottawa · CACanadian Blood Services · CAMount Sinai Hospital · CAUniversité de Montréal · CA

Funding

Canadian Insititutes of Health Research 378288
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionWith over 1 million units of blood transfused each year in Canada, their use has a significant clinical and economic impact on our health system. Adequate screening of blood donors is important to ensure the safety and clinical benefit of blood products. Some adverse transfusion reactions have been shown to be related to donor factors (eg, lung injury), whereas other adverse outcomes have been theoretically related to donor factors (mortality and infection). Our clinical trial will test whether male donor blood leads to a greater benefit for transfusion recipients compared with female donor blood. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We have designed a pragmatic, double-blind, randomised trial that will allocate transfusion recipients to receive either male-only or female-only donor transfusions. We will enrol 8850 adult patients requiring at least one transfusion at four sites over an approximate 2-year period. Randomisation and allocation will occur in the blood bank prior to release of the units of blood for transfusion. Our primary outcome is mortality. An intent-to-treat analysis will be applied using all randomised and transfused patients. The principal analysis will be a survival analysis comparing the time from randomisation to death between patients allocated to male donor red blood cells (RBCs) and female donor RBCs. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Approval has been obtained from research ethics boards of all involved institutions, as well as from privacy offices of Canadian Blood Services, Institute for Clinical Evaluative Science and The Ottawa Hospital Data Warehouse. Our findings will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at relevant stakeholder conferences and meetings. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03344887; Pre-results.

Indexed as

ErythrocytesErythrocyte TransfusionAdultCanadaDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHospitalsHumansMalePragmatic Clinical Trials as TopicRandomized Controlled Trials as Topicanaemiablood bank & transfusion medicineclinical trials

Identifiers

PMID33622960
PMCPMC7907852
OpenAlexW3132868312

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.