Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33622945›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2021

Healthcare system maturity for integrated care: results of a Swiss nationwide survey using the SCIROCCO tool.

Isabelle Peytremann-Bridevaux, Séverine Schusselé Filliettaz, Peter Berchtold, Michelle Grossglauser, Andrea Pavlickova, Ingrid Gilles

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Isabelle Peytremann-BridevauxCenter for Primary Care and Public Health (Unisanté), University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland isabelle.peytremann-bridevaux@unisante.ch.ORCID 0000-0002-6514-8781
Séverine Schusselé FilliettazAssociation for the promotion of integrated patient care networks (PRISM), Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-7475-1120
Peter BerchtoldSwiss Forum for Integrated Care (FMC), Bern, Switzerland.
Michelle GrossglauserCenter for Primary Care and Public Health (Unisanté), University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Andrea PavlickovaTechnology Enabled Care and Digital Healthcare Innovation, National Services Scotland (NHS), Edinburgh, UK.
Ingrid GillesCenter for Primary Care and Public Health (Unisanté), University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo assess the maturity of the Swiss healthcare system for integrated care and to explore whether this maturity varied according to several variables.

designA Swiss nationwide individual electronic survey in November 2019. SETTING AND POPULATION: Stakeholders identified via lists of the Swiss Forum for Integrated Care and of the integrated care unit of the Swiss Federal Office of Public Health, and representatives of 26 cantonal public health departments, were invited to participate. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURE: The outcome was the maturity of the Swiss healthcare system for integrated care, measured with the Scaling Integrated Care in Context maturity model tool (SCIROCCO tool), which comprises 12 dimensions and questions rated on a 6-point scale. ANALYSIS: Univariate analyses were first performed, followed by bivariate analyses, to find out whether maturity varied according to working linguistic region, healthcare profession, main domain of professional activity, implication in integrated care, attitude towards integrated care and attitude towards the Swiss healthcare system.

resultsThe 642 respondents were 53.7 years on average, 42.5% were women, 60.0% and 20.7% worked in the German and French-speaking parts of Switzerland, respectively. Overall, the maturity of the Swiss healthcare system for integrated care was evaluated as low, with dimension means ranging from 1.0 (±1.0) for the 'Funding' dimension to a maximum of 2.7 (±1.1) for 'eHealth Services'. Results only varied according to the working linguistic region.

conclusionsResults highlight a limited maturity of the Swiss healthcare system for integrated care, as assessed at a national level by a large and varied number of healthcare stakeholders. They represent important information for the further development of integrated care in Switzerland, and should help identify areas requiring attention for a successful transformation of the Swiss healthcare system towards more integrated care.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health Care, IntegratedFemaleHumansMaleSurveys and QuestionnairesSwitzerlandorganisation of health servicespublic healthquality in healthcare

Identifiers

PMID33622945
PMCPMC7907879

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.