ArticleBMJ open2021
Learning-by-doing: the importance of experiential knowledge sharing for meeting the information needs of people with colorectal cancer in Germany-a qualitative study.
Article in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- How do patients access and experience long-term care after stroke in the German healthcare system? A qualitative interview study.BMJ open · 2025Article
- Awareness, use and perception of patient versions of clinical practice guidelines - a national cross-sectional survey among patients with a cancer diagnosis and healthcare providers.BMC health services research · 2024Article
- Information needs preferences of Chinese colorectal cancer patients receiving chemotherapy: A discrete choice experiment.Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing · 2024Article
- Investigating people's attitudes towards participating in longitudinal health research: an intersectionality-informed perspective.International journal for equity in health · 2023Article
- "Living for Myself and Others": The Role of an Ostomy Self-Help Group in Thailand in Providing Psychosocial Support.Global qualitative nursing researchArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe aim of this article is to understand how, when and why the topics of information and information needs arise when people diagnosed with colorectal cancer (CRC) narrate their illness experiences.
methodsGuided by principles of grounded theory, a qualitative interview study was conducted that collected a wide variety of illness experiences with CRC in Germany using maximum variation sampling. Sampling criteria included place of residence, age at interview, age at diagnosis, treatment, disease course and sociodemographic factors such as varying family backgrounds and professions. SETTING AND
participantsMen and women diagnosed with CRC in different parts of Germany were sought via physicians, social workers and psychologists in hospital settings, organisations offering psychosocial support for patients with cancer, self-help groups, rehabilitation centres, newspapers and personal contacts. The interviewees in the final sample (n=41) had been diagnosed with CRC between 4 weeks and 36 years prior to the interview.
resultsThree inter-related categories of information needs emerged from the analysis: the need for non-medical information for daily life; the challenge of integrating the bodily changes that accompany CRC in everyday life; and sources of non-medical information concerning handling daily life. Learning to live with the bodily changes of CRC in everyday life was described as a long process of learning-by-doing. While sources for medical information were clear, finding practical information was often a challenge. The best source of such information was often seen to be other people living with the disease, who shared their experiential knowledge, as well as stoma and nutritional therapists.
conclusionInformation needs are part of the process and struggle to normalise everyday life after a disruptive diagnosis and treatment. Providing access to practical knowledge and information from others with CRC experience may be an important resource for patient support.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.