ArticlemSystems2021
Microbiome Metadata Standards: Report of the National Microbiome Data Collaborative's Workshop and Follow-On Activities.
Article in mSystems, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 44 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
44 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Impact of non-standardized reporting on reproducibility, usability, and integration in nasopharyngeal metagenomic research: a systematic review.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Pooled it
- Maternal and infant gut microbiome.iMeta · 2026Review
- Towards standardization in pig microbiome research based on a comprehensive twenty-year review.Animal microbiome · 2026Review
- PRIME: a database for 16S rRNA microbiome data with phenotypic reference and comprehensive metadata.Nucleic acids research · 2026Article
- GGut microbes · 2025Review
- SANA-Biome: A Protocol for a Cross-Sectional Study on Oral Health, Diet, and the Oral Microbiome in Romania.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Tier-based standards for FAIR sequence data and metadata sharing in microbiome research.Nucleic acids research · 2025Article
- A minimum data standard for wildlife disease research and surveillance.Scientific data · 2025Article
- Perceptual and technical barriers in sharing and formatting metadata accompanying omics studies.Cell genomics · 2025Review
- Microbiome data management in action workshop: Atlanta, GA, USA, June 12-13, 2024.Environmental microbiome · 2025Article
- De novo virulence feature discovery and risk assessment in Klebsiella pneumoniae based on microbial genome vectorization.Communications biology · 2025Article
- Quantifying the impact of workshops promoting microbiome data standards and data stewardship.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Beyond microbial abundance: metadata integration enhances disease prediction in human microbiome studies.Frontiers in microbiology · 2025Article
- A standards perspective on genomic data reusability and reproducibility.Frontiers in bioinformatics · 2025Article
- A cost and community perspective on the barriers to microbiome data reuse.Frontiers in bioinformatics · 2025Article
- Article
- Ruminant microbiome data are skewed and unFAIR, undermining their usefulness for sustainable production improvement.Animal microbiome · 2024Article
- Microbiome time series data reveal predictable patterns of change.Microbiology spectrum · 2024Article
- Advancing microbiome research through standardized data and metadata collection: introducing the Microbiome Research Data Toolkit.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2024Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
42 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Microbiome samples are inherently defined by the environment in which they are found. Therefore, data that provide context and enable interpretation of measurements produced from biological samples, often referred to as metadata, are critical. Important contributions have been made in the development of community-driven metadata standards; however, these standards have not been uniformly embraced by the microbiome research community. To understand how these standards are being adopted, or the barriers to adoption, across research domains, institutions, and funding agencies, the National Microbiome Data Collaborative (NMDC) hosted a workshop in October 2019. This report provides a summary of discussions that took place throughout the workshop, as well as outcomes of the working groups initiated at the workshop.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.