Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33622775›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2021

Variable Statistical Structure of Neuronal Spike Trains in Monkey Superior Colliculus.

Seong-Hah Cho, Trinity Crapse, Piercesare Grimaldi, Hakwan Lau, Michele A Basso

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Seong-Hah ChoDepartment of Integrative Biology and Physiology, Los Angeles, California 90095.
Trinity CrapseFuster Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience, Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, Jane and Terry Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behaviour, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California 90095.
Piercesare GrimaldiFuster Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience, Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, Jane and Terry Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behaviour, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California 90095.
Hakwan LauDepartment of Psychology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California 90095.
Michele A BassoFuster Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience, Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, Jane and Terry Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behaviour, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California 90095 mbasso@mednet.ucla.edu.

Funding

RESEARCH CENTER FOR CEREBRAL VASCULAR DISEASE (SUPL II)P01NS005820 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI GINSBERG, MYRON DAVID · 1987 to 2004
$7.5M
NINDS NIH HHS P01 NS005820
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Popular models of decision-making propose that noisy sensory evidence accumulates until reaching a bound. Behavioral evidence as well as trial-averaged ramping of neuronal activity in sensorimotor regions of the brain support this idea. However, averaging activity across trials can mask other processes, such as rapid shifts in decision commitment, calling into question the hypothesis that evidence accumulation is encoded by delay period activity of individual neurons. We mined two sets of data from experiments in four monkeys in which we recorded from superior colliculus neurons during two different decision-making tasks and a delayed saccade task. We applied second-order statistical measures and spike train simulations to determine whether spiking statistics were similar or different in the different tasks and monkeys, despite similar trial-averaged activity across tasks and monkeys. During a motion direction discrimination task, single-trial delay period activity behaved statistically consistent with accumulation. During an orientation detection task, the activity behaved superficially like accumulation, but statistically consistent with stepping. Simulations confirmed both findings. Importantly, during a simple saccade task, with similar trial-averaged activity, neither process explained spiking activity, ruling out interpretations based on differences in attention, reward, or motor planning. These results highlight the need for exploring single-trial spiking dynamics to understand cognitive processing and raise the interesting hypothesis that the superior colliculus participates in different aspects of decision-making depending on task differences.

Indexed as

Action PotentialsAnimalsDecision MakingMacaca mulattaMaleMotion PerceptionNeuronsPhotic StimulationPsychomotor PerformanceSaccadesSuperior Colliculiaccumulationdecision-makingnonhuman primateramping activityspiking statisticssuperior colliclulus

Identifiers

PMID33622775
PMCPMC8026361

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.