Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33622383›Full record

ArticlePlant methods2021

Optimization of protoplast regeneration in the model plant Arabidopsis thaliana.

Yeong Yeop Jeong, Hun-Young Lee, Suk Weon Kim, Yoo-Sun Noh, Pil Joon Seo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant methods, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yeong Yeop JeongDepartment of Chemistry, Seoul National University, Seoul, 08826, Korea.
Hun-Young LeePlant Genomics and Breeding Institute, Seoul National University, Seoul, 08826, Korea.
Suk Weon KimBiological Resource Center, Korea Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology, Jeongeup, 56212, Korea.
Yoo-Sun NohPlant Genomics and Breeding Institute, Seoul National University, Seoul, 08826, Korea.
Pil Joon SeoDepartment of Chemistry, Seoul National University, Seoul, 08826, Korea. pjseo1@snu.ac.kr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5499-3138

Funding

Samsung Science and Technology Foundation SSTF-BA2001-10
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPlants have a remarkable reprogramming potential, which facilitates plant regeneration, especially from a single cell. Protoplasts have the ability to form a cell wall and undergo cell division, allowing whole plant regeneration. With the growing need for protoplast regeneration in genetic engineering and genome editing, fundamental studies that enhance our understanding of cell cycle re-entry, pluripotency acquisition, and de novo tissue regeneration are essential. To conduct these studies, a reproducible and efficient protoplast regeneration method using model plants is necessary.

resultsHere, we optimized cell and tissue culture methods for improving protoplast regeneration efficiency in Arabidopsis thaliana. Protoplasts were isolated from whole seedlings of four different Arabidopsis ecotypes including Columbia (Col-0), Wassilewskija (Ws-2), Nossen (No-0), and HR (HR-10). Among these ecotypes, Ws-2 showed the highest potential for protoplast regeneration. A modified thin alginate layer was applied to the protoplast culture at an optimal density of 1 × 10

conclusionThe cell and tissue culture system optimized in this study for protoplast regeneration is efficient and reproducible. This method of Arabidopsis protoplast regeneration can be used for fundamental studies on pluripotency establishment and de novo tissue regeneration.

Indexed as

Cell divisionDe novo organogenesisPlant regenerationPluripotencyProtoplast

Identifiers

PMID33622383
PMCPMC7901198

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.