Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33622278›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2021

The relationship between inequitable gender norms and provider attitudes and quality of care in maternal health services in Rwanda: a mixed methods study.

Kate Doyle, Shamsi Kazimbaya, Ruti Levtov, Joya Banerjee, Myra Betron, Reena Sethi, Marie Rose Kayirangwa, Kristina Vlahovicova, Felix Sayinzoga, Rosemary Morgan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
10.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Gender inequity in postpartum hemorrhage: A public health issue.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Kate DoylePromundo-US, 1367 Connecticut Avenue, NW, Suite 310, Washington, DC, 20036, USA. k.doyle@promundoglobal.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9497-4831
Shamsi KazimbayaPromundo-US, 1367 Connecticut Avenue, NW, Suite 310, Washington, DC, 20036, USA.
Ruti LevtovPromundo-US, 1367 Connecticut Avenue, NW, Suite 310, Washington, DC, 20036, USA.
Joya BanerjeePresent Address: The Prevention Collaborative, Washington, DC, USA.
Myra BetronMaternal and Child Survival Program/Jhpiego, 1776 Massachusetts Ave, NW, Suite 300, Washington, DC, 20036, USA.
Reena SethiMaternal and Child Survival Program/Jhpiego, 1776 Massachusetts Ave, NW, Suite 300, Washington, DC, 20036, USA.
Marie Rose KayirangwaMaternal and Child Survival Program/Jhpiego, 8 Avenue, Rwanda National Police (RNP Road), Kigali, Rwanda.
Kristina VlahovicovaPromundo-US, 1367 Connecticut Avenue, NW, Suite 310, Washington, DC, 20036, USA.
Felix SayinzogaMaternal, Child and Community Health Division, Rwanda Ministry of Health, Rwanda Biomedical Center, Kigali, Rwanda.
Rosemary MorganDepartment of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 615 N Wolfe St, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA.
Promundo · USAssociated Press · USJohns Hopkins University · USRwanda Biomedical Center · RW

Funding

United States Agency for International Development Cooperative Agreement AID-OAA-A-14-00028
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRwanda has made great progress in improving reproductive, maternal, and newborn health (RMNH) care; however, barriers to ensuring timely and full RMNH service utilization persist, including women's limited decision-making power and poor-quality care. This study sought to better understand whether and how gender and power dynamics between providers and clients affect their perceptions and experiences of quality care during antenatal care, labor and childbirth.

methodsThis mixed methods study included a self-administered survey with 151 RMNH providers with questions on attitudes about gender roles, RMNH care, provider-client relations, labor and childbirth, which took place between January to February 2018. Two separate factor analyses were conducted on provider responses to create a Gender Attitudes Scale and an RMNH Quality of Care Scale. Three focus group discussions (FGDs) conducted in February 2019 with RMNH providers, female and male clients, explored attitudes about gender norms, provision and quality of RMNH care, provider-client interactions and power dynamics, and men's involvement. Data were analyzed thematically.

resultsInequitable gender norms and attitudes - among both RMNH care providers and clients - impact the quality of RMNH care. The qualitative results illustrate how gender norms and attitudes influence the provision of care and provider-client interactions, in addition to the impact of men's involvement on the quality of care. Complementing this finding, the survey found a relationship between health providers' gender attitudes and their attitudes towards quality RMNH care: gender equitable attitudes were associated with greater support for respectful, quality RMNH care.

conclusionsOur findings suggest that gender attitudes and power dynamics between providers and their clients, and between female clients and their partners, can negatively impact the utilization and provision of quality RMNH care. There is a need for capacity building efforts to challenge health providers' inequitable gender attitudes and practices and equip them to be aware of gender and power dynamics between themselves and their clients. These efforts can be made alongside community interventions to transform harmful gender norms, including those that increase women's agency and autonomy over their bodies and their health care, promote uptake of health services, and improve couple power dynamics.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelMaternal Health ServicesPrenatal CareProfessional-Patient RelationsQuality of Health CareSexismAdultDelivery, ObstetricFemaleHumansInfant HealthInfant, NewbornMaleMaternal HealthMiddle AgedParturitionAntenatal careDisrespect and abuseGenderLabor and childbirthMaternal and newborn healthMistreatmentMixed methodsQuality of careRwanda

Identifiers

PMID33622278
PMCPMC7903699
OpenAlexW3130081619

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.