Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33622249›Full record

ArticleBMC gastroenterology2021

Instrument to evaluate the knowledge of patient with cirrhosis on his disease: construction and validity.

Mariana Stelmach, Kayo Augusto de Almeida Medeiros, Bárbara Justo Carvalho, Leonardo Zumerkorn Pipek, Gustavo Heluani Antunes de Mesquita, Fernanda Nii, Diego Ramos Martines, Leandro Ryuchi Iuamoto, Luiz Augusto Carneiro D'Albuquerque, Alberto Meyer and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in BMC gastroenterology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Mariana StelmachDepartamento de Gastroenterologia, Hospital das Clínicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, Avenida Doutor Arnaldo, 455, São Paulo, Brazil.
Kayo Augusto de Almeida MedeirosFaculdade de Medicina FMUSP, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Bárbara Justo CarvalhoFaculdade de Medicina FMUSP, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Leonardo Zumerkorn PipekFaculdade de Medicina FMUSP, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Gustavo Heluani Antunes de MesquitaFaculdade de Medicina FMUSP, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Fernanda NiiFaculdade de Medicina FMUSP, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Diego Ramos MartinesFaculdade de Medicina FMUSP, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Leandro Ryuchi IuamotoCenter of Acupuncture, Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Luiz Augusto Carneiro D'AlbuquerqueDepartamento de Gastroenterologia, Hospital das Clínicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, Avenida Doutor Arnaldo, 455, São Paulo, Brazil.
Alberto MeyerDepartamento de Gastroenterologia, Hospital das Clínicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, Avenida Doutor Arnaldo, 455, São Paulo, Brazil. alberto.meyer@usp.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8408-0508
Wellington AndrausDepartamento de Gastroenterologia, Hospital das Clínicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, Avenida Doutor Arnaldo, 455, São Paulo, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe application of measurement instruments is a strategy to evaluate the patient's knowledge about the disease. This study aims to build an instrument that evaluates the patient's knowledge about liver cirrhosis.

methodThis study includes three phases. The first one was the construction of the instrument based on a literature review. In the second phase, five experts were participated in the evaluation of the instrument, to check the validity of the content. Quantitative and qualitative analyzes were made. The tool used was the CVI (Content Validity Index) and it was used the semantic study of the questions. The third phase was the process of the restructuring the instrument.

resultsThe final version of the instrument consisted of 36 questions. The instrument was evaluated in 91.7 by the average CVI and 94.4% by the universal CVI.

conclusionsThe questions are properly structured and clear, therefore, understandable. Thus, the final instrument presented satisfactory content validity, so that, it reached the aim of this study.

Indexed as

Liver CirrhosisHumansPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesHealth educationLiver cirrhosisSurveys and questionnaires knowledgeValidation studies

Identifiers

PMID33622249
PMCPMC7903789

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.