Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33622247›Full record

ArticleBMC emergency medicine2021

Prognostic value of neutrophil- lymphocyte count ratio (NLCR) among adult ICU patients in comparison to APACHE II score and conventional inflammatory markers: a multi center retrospective cohort study.

Tao Zhou, Nan Zheng, Xiang Li, Dongmei Zhu, Yi Han

Registry-linked trialAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC emergency medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05636202 (The Early Predictive Roles of NLR and NE% in In-hospital Mortality of Septic Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05636202 completednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

The Early Predictive Roles of NLR and NE% in In-hospital Mortality of Septic Patients: a Single-center 13-year Retrospective Study

TypeobservationalSponsorUnion Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and TechnologyRan2022 to 2022Enrolled606ConditionsSepsis, InfectionsArmsNo intervention
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Tao ZhouDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing Medical University, 300 Guangzhou Road, Nanjing, 210029, China.
Nan ZhengDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing Medical University, 300 Guangzhou Road, Nanjing, 210029, China.
Xiang LiDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing Medical University, 300 Guangzhou Road, Nanjing, 210029, China.
Dongmei ZhuDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing Medical University, 300 Guangzhou Road, Nanjing, 210029, China.
Yi HanDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing Medical University, 300 Guangzhou Road, Nanjing, 210029, China. hanyi@jsph.org.cn.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 81770287National Natural Science Foundation of China 82070475
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNeutrophil-lymphocyte count ratio (NLCR) has been reported as better indicator of bacteremia than procalcitonin (PCT), and more precise predictor of mortality than C-reactive protein (CRP) under various medical conditions. However, large controversy remains upon this topic. To address the discrepancy, our group has compared the efficiency of NLCR with conventional inflammatory markers in predicting the prognosis of critical illness.

methodsWe performed a multi-center retrospective cohort study involving 536 ICU patients with outcomes of survival, 28- and 7-day mortality. NLCR was compared with conventional inflammatory markers such as PCT, CRP, serum lactate (LAC), white blood cell, neutrophil and severity score APACHE II (Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II) to evaluate the potential outcomes of critical illness. Then, receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves were constructed to assess and compare each marker's sensitivity and specificity respectively.

resultsNLCR values were not different between survival and mortality groups. Meanwhile, remarkable differences were observed upon APACHE II score, CRP, PCT and LAC levels between survival and death groups. ROC analysis revealed that NLCR was not competent to predict prognosis of critical illness. The AUROCs of conventional markers such as CRP, PCT, LAC and APACHE II score were more effective in predicting 28- and 7-day mortality.

conclusionsNLCR is less reliable than conventional markers CRP, PCT, LAC and APACHE II score in assessing severity and in predicting outcomes of critical illness.

Indexed as

APACHELymphocyte CountSepsisAdultHumansInflammationIntensive Care UnitsNeutrophilsPrognosisRetrospective StudiesAPACHE IICritical illnessCRPInflammationNeutrophil lymphocyte count ratioProcalcitonin

Identifiers

PMID33622247
PMCPMC7903782

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.