Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33622134›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2021

Maximum CO

Guillaume Théroux-Rancourt, Adam B Roddy, J Mason Earles, Matthew E Gilbert, Maciej A Zwieniecki, C Kevin Boyce, Danny Tholen, Andrew J McElrone, Kevin A Simonin, Craig R Brodersen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Growth under pressure: The pros and cons of polyploidy induced by stress.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Photosynthetic Responses ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Guillaume Théroux-RancourtInstitute of Botany, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, 1180 Vienna, Austria.
Adam B RoddyInstitute of Environment, Department of Biological Sciences, Florida International University, Miami, FL 33199, USA.
J Mason EarlesDepartment of Viticulture and Enology, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
Matthew E GilbertDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
Maciej A ZwienieckiDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
C Kevin BoyceDepartment of Geological Sciences, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA 94305, USA.
Danny TholenInstitute of Botany, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, 1180 Vienna, Austria.
Andrew J McElroneDepartment of Viticulture and Enology, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
Kevin A SimoninDepartment of Biology, San Francisco State University, San Francisco, CA 94132, USA.
Craig R BrodersenSchool of the Environment, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06511, USA.

Funding

Austrian Science Fund FWF M 2245
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Maintaining high rates of photosynthesis in leaves requires efficient movement of CO

Indexed as

Carbon DioxideMesophyll CellsCell SizeGenome SizePhotosynthesisPlant LeavesCarbon Dioxidegas diffusionintercellular airspaceleaf mesophyllvascular plants

Identifiers

PMID33622134
PMCPMC7934972

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.