Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33622118›Full record

ArticleSports health

Effects of Different Recovery Times on Internal and External Load During Small-Sided Games in Soccer.

Luis Branquinho, Ricardo Ferraz, Bruno Travassos, Daniel A Marinho, Mário C Marques

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sports health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Monitoring Accumulated Training and Match Load in Football: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. The Aging Curve: How Age Affects Physical Performance in Elite Football.Journal of functional morphology and kinesiology · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. New Epidemic?Sports health
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Luis BranquinhoDepartment of Sports Sciences, University of Beira Interior, Covilhã, Portugal.
Ricardo FerrazDepartment of Sports Sciences, University of Beira Interior, Covilhã, Portugal.
Bruno TravassosDepartment of Sports Sciences, University of Beira Interior, Covilhã, Portugal.
Daniel A MarinhoDepartment of Sports Sciences, University of Beira Interior, Covilhã, Portugal.
Mário C MarquesDepartment of Sports Sciences, University of Beira Interior, Covilhã, Portugal.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe ability to maintain a high intensity of exercise over several repetitions depends on recovery from previous exercises. This study aimed to identify the effects of different recovery times on internal and external load during small-sided soccer games. HYPOTHESIS: An increase in recovery time will increase the external training load and decrease the internal exercise load, which will result in a greater physical impact of the exercise. STUDY

designCross-sectional study. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 2.

methodsTwenty male semiprofessional soccer players participated in the present study. They performed the same exercise (5-a-side game format) continuously (1 × 18 minutes) and repeatedly/fractionated (3 × 6 minutes) with different recovery times (30 seconds, 1 minute, 1.5 minutes, and 2 minutes). Their internal load (ie, average heart rate (HR) and maximum HR) and external load (ie, total distance, maximum speed, and ratio meters) were measured using an HR band and an inertial device equipped with a global positioning system, respectively.

resultsThe manipulation of recovery times induced differences in the internal and external load. For the same total duration, the external and internal load indicators exhibited higher values during the fractionated method, particularly with short recovery periods.

conclusionThe application of small-sided soccer games with different recovery times induced varying responses in training load. To maintain high physical performance and high training load, the fractional method with short recovery periods (ie, 30 seconds) should be used. In contrast, to carefully manage players' efforts and decrease response to training load, continuous or fractional methods with longer recovery periods (ie, 1-2 minutes) should be used. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The proper prescription of recovery time between exercises facilitates enhanced training efficiency and optimized performance.

Indexed as

Athletic PerformanceCross-Sectional StudiesGeographic Information SystemsHeart RateHumansMaleMuscle FatiguePhysical ExertionSoccerTask Performance and AnalysisTime Factorsfatiguerecovery timesmall-sided game manipulationsoccertraining load

Identifiers

PMID33622118
PMCPMC8645317

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.