Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33621720›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of nursing studies2021

Strict isolation requires a different approach to the family of hospitalised patients with COVID-19: A rapid qualitative study.

J M Maaskant, I P Jongerden, J Bik, M Joosten, S Musters, M N Storm-Versloot, J Wielenga, A M Eskes, FAM-Corona Group

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of nursing studies, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. COVID-19 Pandemic and Healthcare Communication: A Patient-Centric Evaluation of Treatment and Diagnostic Procedures in Poland.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

J M MaaskantEmma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. Electronic address: j.m.maaskant@amsterdamumc.nl.
I P JongerdenDepartment of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, Amsterdam UMC, VU University, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
J BikDepartment of Internal Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, VU University, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
M JoostenDepartment of Internal Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, VU University, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
S MustersDepartment of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
M N Storm-VerslootDepartment of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
J WielengaEmma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
A M EskesDepartment of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Menzies Health Institute Queensland and School of Nursing and Midwifery, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Australia.
FAM-Corona Group
Amsterdam University Medical Centers · NLEmma Kinderziekenhuis · NLGriffith University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic influenced family-centred care dramatically due to restricting visiting policies. In this new situation, nurses were challenged to develop new approaches to involve family members in patient care. A better understanding of these changes and the experiences of nurses is essential to make an adaptation of procedures, and to secure a family-centred approach in care as much as possible.

objectivesThe aim of this study was to investigate how family involvement had taken place, and to explore the experiences of nurses with family involvement during the COVID-19 outbreak. In addition, we aimed to formulate recommendations for the involvement of family.

methodsWe conducted a qualitative study using patient record review and focus-group interviews between April and July 2020. We reviewed records of patients with confirmed COVID-19, who were admitted to the COVID-19 wards at two affiliated university hospitals in the Netherlands. All records were searched for notations referring to family involvement. In two focus-groups, nurses who worked at the COVID-19 wards were invited to share their experiences. The Rigorous and Accelerated Data Reduction (RADaR) method was used to collect, reduce and analyse the data.

resultsIn total, 189 patient records were reviewed and nine nurses participated in the focus-group meetings. Patient records revealed infrequent and often unstructured communication with focus on physical condition. Nurses confirmed that communication with family was far less than before and that the physical condition of the patient was predominant. The involvement of family in care was limited to practicalities, although more involvement was described in end-of-life situations. Nurses experienced moral distress due to the visiting restrictions, though some acknowledged that they had experienced the direct patient care so intense and burdensome, that family contact simply felt too much.

conclusionThe communication with and involvement of family in hospital care changed enormously during the COVID-19 outbreak. Based on the identified themes, we formulated recommendations that may be helpful for family-centered care in hospitals during periods of restricted visiting policy.

Indexed as

COVID-19PandemicsHumansNetherlandsQualitative ResearchSARS-CoV-2CommunicationCOVID-19Family-centred careFamily involvementNursing care

Identifiers

PMID33621720
PMCPMC7834466
OpenAlexW3115539328

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.