Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33621472›Full record

ArticlePerspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science2021

Moral Reasoning Enables Developmental and Societal Change.

Melanie Killen, Audun Dahl

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Moral dilemma of family caregivers of urostomy patients: a qualitative study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. An Intuitive Model of Bystander Responses to Workplace Mistreatment.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. When development constricts our moral circle.Nature human behaviour · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Social psychology of education : an international journal · 2025
    Article
  13. Knowledge Versus Understanding: What Drives Moral Progress?Ethical theory and moral practice : an international forum · 2025
    Article
  14. The meaning of ethical collaborative research according to young people.International journal of adolescence and youth · 2025
    Article
  15. Does Intergroup Contact Increase Children's Desire to Play with Diverse Peers and Reduce Experiences of Social Exclusion?Peace and conflict : journal of peace psychology : the journal of the Division of Peace Psychology of the American Psychological Association · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Let's not get ahead of ourselves: we have no idea if moral reasoning causes moral progress.Philosophical explorations : an international journal for the philosophy of mind and action · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Melanie KillenDepartment of Human Development and Quantitative Methodology, University of Maryland, College Park.ORCID 0000-0002-6392-9373
Audun DahlDepartment of Psychology, University of California, Santa Cruz.ORCID 0000-0002-1528-4347

Funding

An Intervention to Promote Positive Peer Relationships and Reduce Prejudice and Bias in ChildhoodR01HD093698 · NICHD · UNIV OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · PI KILLEN, MELANIE ANN · 2019 to 2022
$1.6M
The Emergence of Prosocial Behavior in Infants.R03HD087590 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SANTA CRUZ · PI DAHL, AUDUN · 2017 to 2018
$154k
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD093698NICHD NIH HHS R03 HD087590
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Moral reasoning is an essential part of how humans develop and a fundamental aspect of how human societies change over time. On a developmental timescale, reasoning about interpersonal disagreements and dilemmas spurs age-related changes in moral judgments from childhood to adulthood. When asked to distribute resources among others, even young children strive to balance competing concerns with equality, merit, and need. Over the course of development, reasoning and judgments about resource distribution and other moral issues become increasingly sophisticated. From childhood to adulthood, individuals not only evaluate acts as right or wrong but also take the extra steps to rectify inequalities, protest unfair norms, and resist stereotypic expectations about others. The development of moral reasoning also enables change on a societal timescale. Across centuries and communities, ordinary individuals have called for societal change based on moral concerns with welfare, rights, fairness, and justice. Individuals have effectively employed reasoning to identify and challenge injustices. In this article, we synthesize recent insights from developmental science about the roles of moral reasoning in developmental and societal change. In the concluding section, we turn to questions for future research on moral reasoning and change.

Indexed as

JudgmentMoralsAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolHumansSocial JusticeStereotypingYoung Adultadolescent developmentchild developmentculture/diversitymoral reasoningthinking/reasoning/judgment

Identifiers

PMID33621472
PMCPMC8380749

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.