Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33621004›Full record

ArticleInternational braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology

Prostate Cancer Screening in Brazil: a single center experience in the public health system.

Renato Almeida Rosa de Oliveira, Gustavo Cardoso Guimarães, Thiago Camelo Mourão, Ricardo de Lima Favaretto, Thiago Borges Marques Santana, Ademar Lopes, Stenio de Cassio Zequi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Prostate cancer mortality and costs of prostate surgical procedures in the Brazilian public health system.International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Infertility highlighted in International Brazilian Journal of Urology.International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Renato Almeida Rosa de OliveiraDepartamento de Uro-Oncologia, Hospital Beneficência Portuguesa de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
Gustavo Cardoso GuimarãesServiço de Oncologia Cirúrgica, Hospital Beneficência Portuguesa de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
Thiago Camelo MourãoDepartamento de Uro-Oncologia, Hospital Beneficência Portuguesa de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
Ricardo de Lima FavarettoDepartamento de Uro-Oncologia, Hospital Beneficência Portuguesa de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
Thiago Borges Marques SantanaDepartamento de Uro-Oncologia, Hospital Beneficência Portuguesa de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
Ademar LopesServiço de Cirurgia Pélvica do AC Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
Stenio de Cassio ZequiDivisão de Urologia, AC Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIncidence and mortality of prostate cancer (PCa) are still increasing in developing countries. Limited access to the health system or more aggressive disease are potential reasons for this. Ethnic and social differences in developed countries seem to make inappropriate to extrapolate data from other centers. We aim to report the epidemiological profile of a PSA-screened population from a cancer center in Brazil. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe retrospectively selected 9.692 men enrolled in a PCa prevention program, comprising total PSA level and digital rectal examination at the first appointment, associated with complementary tests when necessary. Men aged over 40 years-old were included after shared decision-making process. Prostate biopsy (TRUS) was performed when clinically suspected for PCa. After the diagnosis, patients underwent appropriate treatment.

resultsTRUS was performed in 5.5% of men and PCa incidence was 2.6%. Overall ratio between number of patients who needed to be screened in order to diagnose one cancer was 38.9 patients, with 2.1 biopsies performed to diagnose a cancer. Positive predictive value (PPV) of TRUS biopsy in this strategy was 47.2%, varying from 38.5% (<50 years-old) to 60% (>80 years-old). We evidenced 70 patients (27.9%) classified as low risk tumors, 74 (29.5%) as intermediate risk, and 107 (42.6%) as high-risk disease.

conclusionsPSA-screening remains controversial in literature. In front of a huge miscegenated people and considering the big proportion of high-risk PCa, even in young men diagnosed with the disease, it is imperative to inform patients and health providers about these data particularities in Brazil.

Indexed as

Prostate-Specific AntigenProstatic NeoplasmsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiopsyBrazilEarly Detection of CancerHumansMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsPublic HealthRetrospective StudiesProstate-Specific AntigenMass ScreeningProstate cancer, familial [Supplementary Concept]Therapeutics

Identifiers

PMID33621004
PMCPMC7993978

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.