ArticlePsychonomic bulletin & review2021
Proactive distractor suppression elicited by statistical regularities in visual search.
Article in Psychonomic bulletin & review, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 68 citations in OpenAlex.
- The puzzle of profitless pre-cues.Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2026Pooled it
- Temporal dynamics of adapting to novel contexts during the generalization of learned spatial suppression.Journal of vision · 2026Article
- Learned statistical regularity modulates anticipatory micro-saccades toward suppressed distractor locations.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Learning alters salience and proactive attentional priority.Communications psychology · 2026Article
- Differential Modulation of Attention by Aversive Associative and Statistical Learning in Distinct Visual Search Modes.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Visual statistical learning requires attention.Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2025Article
- Learning Modulates Early Encephalographic Responses to Distracting Stimuli: A Combined SSVEP and ERP Study.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025Article
- Article
- Neural mechanisms of learned suppression uncovered by probing the hidden attentional priority map.eLife · 2025Article
- Article
- Reward History and Statistical Learning Independently Impact Attention Search: An ERP Study.Brain sciences · 2024Article
- Attending is not enough: Responding to targets is needed for across-trial statistical learning.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2024Article
- The effects of eccentricity on attentional capture.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2024Article
- Learned relevance of a distracting cue can influence feature interference errors.Visual cognition · 2024Article
- Pinging the brain to reveal the hidden attentional priority map using encephalography.Nature communications · 2023Article
- Statistical learning of distractor locations is dependent on task context.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Attentional suppression is in place before display onset.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2023Article
- Predictability reduces event file retrieval.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2023Article
- Statistical learning of spatiotemporal regularities dynamically guides visual attention across space.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2023Article
- Attentional priority is determined by predicted feature distributions.Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Irrelevant salient objects may capture our attention and interfere with visual search. Recently, it was shown that distraction by a salient object is reduced when it is presented more frequently at one location than at other locations. The present study investigates whether this reduced distractor interference is the result of proactive spatial suppression, implemented prior to display onset, or reactive suppression, occurring after attention has been directed to that location. Participants were asked to search for a shape singleton in the presence of an irrelevant salient color singleton which was presented more often at one location (the high-probability location) than at all other locations (the low-probability locations). On some trials, instead of the search task, participants performed a probe task, in which they had to detect the offset of a probe dot. The results of the search task replicated previous findings showing reduced distractor interference in trials in which the salient distractor was presented at the high-probability location as compared with the low-probability locations. The probe task showed that reaction times were longer for probes presented at the high-probability location than at the low-probability locations. These results indicate that through statistical learning the location that is likely to contain a distractor is suppressed proactively (i.e., prior to display onset). It suggests that statistical learning modulates the first feed-forward sweep of information processing by deprioritizing locations that are likely to contain a distractor in the spatial priority map.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.