Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33620635›Full record

ArticleEcotoxicology (London, England)2021

Characterization of cadmium biosorption by inactive biomass of two cadmium-tolerant endophytic bacteria Microbacterium sp. D2-2 and Bacillus sp. C9-3.

Jianyou Long, Mingxia Yu, Huaihao Xu, Shuangqiu Huang, Zhu Wang, Xu-Xiang Zhang

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Ecotoxicology (London, England), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Stress-Tolerant Endophytic IsolateInternational journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jianyou LongSchool of Environmental Science and Engineering, Institute of Environmental Research at Greater Bay, Institute of Clean Energy and Materials, Guangzhou Key Laboratory for Clean Energy and Materials, Key Laboratory for Water Quality and Conservation of the Pearl River Delta, Ministry of Education, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou, 510006, China.
Mingxia YuSchool of Environmental Science and Engineering, Institute of Environmental Research at Greater Bay, Institute of Clean Energy and Materials, Guangzhou Key Laboratory for Clean Energy and Materials, Key Laboratory for Water Quality and Conservation of the Pearl River Delta, Ministry of Education, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou, 510006, China.
Huaihao XuSchool of Environmental Science and Engineering, Institute of Environmental Research at Greater Bay, Institute of Clean Energy and Materials, Guangzhou Key Laboratory for Clean Energy and Materials, Key Laboratory for Water Quality and Conservation of the Pearl River Delta, Ministry of Education, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou, 510006, China.
Shuangqiu HuangSchool of Environmental Science and Engineering, Institute of Environmental Research at Greater Bay, Institute of Clean Energy and Materials, Guangzhou Key Laboratory for Clean Energy and Materials, Key Laboratory for Water Quality and Conservation of the Pearl River Delta, Ministry of Education, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou, 510006, China.
Zhu WangSchool of Environmental Science and Engineering, Institute of Environmental Research at Greater Bay, Institute of Clean Energy and Materials, Guangzhou Key Laboratory for Clean Energy and Materials, Key Laboratory for Water Quality and Conservation of the Pearl River Delta, Ministry of Education, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou, 510006, China. wangzhu@gzhu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6763-8194
Xu-Xiang ZhangState Key Laboratory of Pollution Control and Resource Reuse, School of the Environment, Nanjing University, Nanjing, 210023, China.
Guangzhou University · CNState Key Laboratory of Pollution Control and Resource Reuse · CN

Funding

Guangdong innovation platform characteristic innovation project 2016KTSCX106Guangzhou Research Collaborative Innovation Projects 201804010281National Natural Science Foundation of China 51608134Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province 2018A0303130265State Key Laboratory of Pollution Control and Resource Reuse PCRRF19010
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this study, two cadmium-tolerant endophytic bacteria (Microbacterium sp. D2-2 and Bacillus sp. C9-3) were employed as biosorbents to remove Cd(II) from aqueous solutions. The influence of initial pH, initial Cd(II) concentration, adsorbent biomass, temperature and contact time on Cd(II) removal were investigated. Results showed that the Langmuir isotherms were found to best fit the equilibrium data, and the maximum biosorption capacities were found to be 222.22 and 163.93 mg/g at a solution pH of 5.0 for Microbacterium sp. D2-2 and Bacillus sp. C9-3, respectively. The biosorption kinetics followed well pseudo-second-order kinetics. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopic analysis suggested that the hydroxyl, carboxyl, carbonyl and amino groups on Microbacterium sp. D2-2 and Bacillus sp. C9-3 biomass were the main binding sites for Cd(II). The results presented in this study showed that Microbacterium sp. D2-2 and Bacillus sp. C9-3 are potential and promising adsorbents for the effective removal of Cd(II) from aqueous solutions.

Indexed as

BacillusWater Pollutants, ChemicalAdsorptionBiomassCadmiumHydrogen-Ion ConcentrationKineticsMicrobacteriumSpectroscopy, Fourier Transform InfraredCadmiumWater Pollutants, ChemicalCadmium biosorptionEndophytic bacteriaIsothermsKinetics

Identifiers

PMID33620635
OpenAlexW3132136575

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.