Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33620538›Full record

Observational studyInternational urogynecology journal2021

The prevalence of frailty and post-treatment outcomes in elderly women with pelvic floor disorders.

Kelly de Jong, Matthieu Y van der Vlist, Daniëlla M J Oom

Abstract readObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in International urogynecology journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kelly de JongDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Albert Schweitzerplaats 25, 3318 AT, Dordrecht, The Netherlands. D.M.J.Oom@asz.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2002-4993
Matthieu Y van der VlistDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Albert Schweitzerplaats 25, 3318 AT, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
Daniëlla M J OomDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Albert Schweitzerplaats 25, 3318 AT, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introduction and hypothesisWomen seeking treatment for pelvic floor disorders (PFD) may have a high prevalence of frailty, which could potentially impact the risks of treatment. The present study was aimed to assess the prevalence of frailty in patients with PFD and additionally to compare post-treatment complications between frail and non-frail patients.

methodsThis is a prospective observational study conducted in a single secondary referral centre for PFD. Women with PFD and aged ≥ 65 years were eligible for inclusion. Frailty was classified using a validated screening tool, the Groningen Frailty Indicator (GFI). The primary outcome was to determine the prevalence of frailty in elderly women with symptoms of pelvic floor disorders. Secondary outcomes were clinical outcomes after treatment between frail and non-frail patients.

resultsA total of 263 women were included. The prevalence of frailty was 54.4% (143 women, 95% CI 48.1-60.5) in the studied group of patients. Frail patients had more comorbidities and used more medication compared to non-frail patients. Non-frail patients were more often surgically treated than frail patients. No differences were found in the incidence of postoperative complications.

conclusionsOur study shows a high prevalence of frailty in elderly women with symptoms of PFD. Further research is required to investigate whether these frail patients face an increased risk of complications and poor clinical outcomes after treatment for PFD.

Indexed as

FrailtyPelvic Floor DisordersPelvic Organ ProlapseAgedFemaleHumansPrevalenceSurveys and QuestionnairesTreatment OutcomeFrailtyPelvic floor dysfunction (PFD)Pelvic organ prolapse (POP)Urinary incontinence (UI)Women

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.