Organ donation after controlled cardiocirculatory death: confidence by clarity.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

1. The Heart Team approach to cardiac arrest.European heart journal supplements : journal of the European Society of Cardiology · 2025
   Article
2. ECPR-the evolving role in cardiac arrest.Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2024
   Review
3. Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation in 2023.Intensive care medicine experimental · 2023
   Review
4. [Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation-When the heart no longer functions].Innere Medizin (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2023
   Review

Corrections and comments

• Comment on
  Expanding controlled donation after the circulatory determination of death: statement from an international collaborative.2021

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as