ReviewInternational journal of health policy and management2021
Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Interventions for Priority Setting in the Health System: An Update From WHO CHOICE.
Review in International journal of health policy and management, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 114 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
114 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Rethinking Tuberculosis Morbidity Quantification: A Systematic Review and Critical Appraisal of TB Disability Weights in Cost-Effectiveness Analyses.PharmacoEconomics · 2024Pooled it
- Economic Evaluation of COVID-19 Immunization Strategies: A Systematic Review and Narrative Synthesis.Applied health economics and health policy · 2024Pooled it
- Newer Pharmacologic Treatments in Adults With Type 2 Diabetes: A Clinical Guideline From the American College of Physicians.Annals of internal medicine · 2024Guideline
- Restrictive versus Liberal Transfusion Strategies in Acute Myocardial Infarction and Anemia: A Meta-Analysis and Trial Sequential Analysis.Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia · 2024Pooled it
- A Systematic Review of Economic Evaluations in Clinical Nursing Practices.Journal of nursing management · 2024Pooled it
- Systematic Literature Review of the Use of Productivity Losses/Gains in Cost-Effectiveness Analyses of Immune-Mediated Disorders.Advances in therapy · 2022Pooled it
- A systematic review and quality appraisal of the economic evaluations of schistosomiasis interventions.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2022Pooled it
- Trial
- Trial
- Economic evaluation of a multi-component obesity prevention intervention in Chinese primary schools.BMC medicine · 2025Trial
- Economic Evaluation of a Multicomponent mHealth Intervention for Stroke Management in Rural China: Cluster-Randomized Trial With 6-Year Follow-Up.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2025Trial
- Economic returns on investing in early childhood development in Vietnam: a cost-benefit analysis.BMC health services research · 2025Trial
- Considering equity and cost-effectiveness in assessing a parenting intervention to promote early childhood development in rural Vietnam.Health policy and planning · 2023Trial
- Caregivers' proxy assessments of health-related quality of life in patients with hematologic malignancies.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026Article
- System-wide investments generate health and enhance HIV, TB and malaria control in Malawi.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Cost-effectiveness of providing pre-exposure and post-exposure prophylaxis for the prevention of HIV via online pharmacies in western Kenya: a modelling study.The Lancet. Global health · 2026Article
- Estimating System-Wide Healthcare Costs Using a Health System Model: Application to the Thanzi La Onse Model of Malawi.Applied health economics and health policy · 2026Article
- Cost per outcome of ICU care under Biju Swasthya Kalyan Yojana in Odisha.The Indian journal of medical research · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence-driven precision treatment of reproductive medicine-related diseases: the optimal protocol choice for IVF-ET.Journal of advanced research · 2026Article
- Article
54 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The World Health Organization's (WHO's) Choosing Interventions that are Cost-Effective (CHOICE) programme has been a global leader in the field of economic evaluation, specifically cost-effectiveness analysis for almost 20 years. WHO-CHOICE takes a "generalized" approach to cost-effectiveness analysis that can be seen as a quantitative assessment of current and future efficiency within a health system. This supports priority setting processes, ensuring that health stewards know how to spend resources in order to achieve the highest health gain as one consideration in strategic planning. This approach is unique in the global health landscape. This paper provides an overview of the methodological approach, updates to analytic framework over the past 10 years, and the added value of the WHO-CHOICE approach in supporting decision makers as they aim to use limited health resources to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) by 2030.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.