Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33619838›Full record

ArticleNMR in biomedicine2021

A plug-and-play, lightweight, single-axis gradient insert design for increasing spatiotemporal resolution in echo planar imaging-based brain imaging.

Edwin Versteeg, Tijl A van der Velden, Carel C van Leeuwen, Martino Borgo, Erik R Huijing, Arjan D Hendriks, Jeroen Hendrikse, Dennis W J Klomp, Jeroen C W Siero

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NMR in biomedicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Edwin VersteegDepartment of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-3235-3970
Tijl A van der VeldenDepartment of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Carel C van LeeuwenDepartment of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Martino BorgoFutura Composites BV, Heerhugowaard, the Netherlands.
Erik R HuijingDepartment of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Arjan D HendriksDepartment of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Jeroen HendrikseDepartment of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Dennis W J KlompDepartment of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Jeroen C W SieroDepartment of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The goal of this study was to introduce and evaluate the performance of a lightweight, high-performance, single-axis (z-axis) gradient insert design primarily intended for high-resolution functional magnetic resonance imaging, and aimed at providing both ease of use and a boost in spatiotemporal resolution. The optimal winding positions of the coil were obtained using a genetic algorithm with a cost function that balanced gradient performance (minimum 0.30 mT/m/A) and field linearity (≥16 cm linear region). These parameters were verified using field distribution measurements by B

Indexed as

Echo-Planar ImagingAdultBrainElectric StimulationFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPeripheral NervesEPI, gradient coil, insert, magnetic resonance imaging, plug-and-play

Identifiers

PMID33619838
PMCPMC8244051

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.