Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33619588›Full record

ArticleActa neuropathologica2021

Clinical and molecular heterogeneity of pineal parenchymal tumors: a consensus study.

Anthony P Y Liu, Bryan K Li, Elke Pfaff, Brian Gudenas, Alexandre Vasiljevic, Brent A Orr, Christelle Dufour, Matija Snuderl, Matthias A Karajannis, Marc K Rosenblum and 22 more

Open access · greenAbstract readConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Article in Acta neuropathologica, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed
7.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 82 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Incidence of Pineal Tumors.Advances and technical standards in neurosurgery · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Histopathology and Molecular Pathology of Pineal Region Tumors.Advances and technical standards in neurosurgery · 2026
    Review
  7. Pineal Gland Parenchyma Tumors.Advances and technical standards in neurosurgery · 2026
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Germline Pathogenic DROSHA Variants Are Linked to Pineoblastoma and Wilms Tumor Predisposition.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2025
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

32 authors at 16 institutions in 7 countries.

Anthony P Y LiuDepartment of Oncology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA.
Bryan K LiDivision of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Pediatrics, The Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, 555 University Ave, Toronto, ON, M5G 1X8, Canada.
Elke PfaffHopp Children's Cancer Center Heidelberg (KiTZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
Brian GudenasDepartment of Developmental Neurobiology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA.
Alexandre VasiljevicFaculté de Médecine Lyon Est, Université Claude Bernard, Lyon 1, Lyon, France.
Brent A OrrDepartment of Pathology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA.
Christelle DufourDepartment of Pediatric and Adolescent Oncology, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.
Matija SnuderlDivision of Neuropathology, NYU Langone Health, New York, USA.
Matthias A KarajannisDepartment of Pediatrics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA.
Marc K RosenblumDepartment of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA.
Eugene I HwangChildren's National Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA.
Ho-Keung NgDepartment of Anatomical and Cellular Pathology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, New Territories, Hong Kong, China.
Jordan R HansfordChildren's Cancer Centre, The Royal Children's Hospital; Murdoch Children's Research Institute; Department of Pediatrics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Alexandru SzathmariDépartement de Neurochirurgie Pédiatrique, Hôpital Femme Mère Enfant, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Bron, France.
Cécile Faure-ConterInstitut D'Hématologie Et D'Oncologie Pédiatrique, IHOPe, Lyon, France.
Thomas E MerchantDepartment of Radiation Oncology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA.
Max LevineDepartment of Pediatrics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA.
Nancy BouvierDepartment of Pediatrics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA.
Katja von HoffDepartment of Pediatric Oncology/Hematology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Martin MynarekDepartment of Paediatric Haematology and Oncology, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Stefan RutkowskiDepartment of Paediatric Haematology and Oncology, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Felix SahmHopp Children's Cancer Center Heidelberg (KiTZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
Marcel KoolHopp Children's Cancer Center Heidelberg (KiTZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
Cynthia HawkinsArthur and Sonia Labatt Brain Tumour Research Centre, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Arzu Onar-ThomasDepartment of Biostatistics, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA.
Giles W RobinsonDepartment of Oncology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA.
Amar GajjarDepartment of Oncology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA.
Stefan M PfisterHopp Children's Cancer Center Heidelberg (KiTZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
Eric BouffetDivision of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Pediatrics, The Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, 555 University Ave, Toronto, ON, M5G 1X8, Canada.
Paul A NorthcottDepartment of Developmental Neurobiology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA.
David T W JonesHopp Children's Cancer Center Heidelberg (KiTZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
Annie HuangDivision of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Pediatrics, The Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, 555 University Ave, Toronto, ON, M5G 1X8, Canada. annie.huang@sickkids.ca.
St. Jude Children's Research Hospital · USMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USGerman Cancer Research Center · DESickKids Foundation · CAHeidelberg University · DEUniversity Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf · DECharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEChildren's National · USChinese University of Hong Kong · CNHôpital Femme Mère Enfant · FRInserm · FRInstitut d’Hématologie et d’Oncologie Pédiatrique · FRMurdoch Children's Research Institute · AUNYU Langone Health · USPathophysiology, Diagnosis and Treatment of Bone Diseases · FRUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
Viral Vector Technology (VVTSR)P30CA021765 · NCI · ST. JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL · PI CHARLES ROBERTS · 1985 to 2026
$166.9M
Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute CA008748Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute CA021765NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NCI NIH HHS P30 CA021765
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent genomic studies have shed light on the biology and inter-tumoral heterogeneity underlying pineal parenchymal tumors, in particular pineoblastomas (PBs) and pineal parenchymal tumors of intermediate differentiation (PPTIDs). Previous reports, however, had modest sample sizes and lacked the power to integrate molecular and clinical findings. The different proposed molecular group structures also highlighted a need to reach consensus on a robust and relevant classification system. We performed a meta-analysis on 221 patients with molecularly characterized PBs and PPTIDs. DNA methylation profiles were analyzed through complementary bioinformatic approaches and molecular subgrouping was harmonized. Demographic, clinical, and genomic features of patients and samples from these pineal tumor groups were annotated. Four clinically and biologically relevant consensus PB groups were defined: PB-miRNA1 (n = 96), PB-miRNA2 (n = 23), PB-MYC/FOXR2 (n = 34), and PB-RB1 (n = 25). A final molecularly distinct group, designated PPTID (n = 43), comprised histological PPTID and PBs. Genomic and transcriptomic profiling allowed the characterization of oncogenic drivers for individual tumor groups, specifically, alterations in the microRNA processing pathway in PB-miRNA1/2, MYC amplification and FOXR2 overexpression in PB-MYC/FOXR2, RB1 alteration in PB-RB1, and KBTBD4 insertion in PPTID. Age at diagnosis, sex predilection, and metastatic status varied significantly among tumor groups. While patients with PB-miRNA2 and PPTID had superior outcome, survival was intermediate for patients with PB-miRNA1, and dismal for those with PB-MYC/FOXR2 or PB-RB1. Reduced-dose CSI was adequate for patients with average-risk, PB-miRNA1/2 disease. We systematically interrogated the clinical and molecular heterogeneity within pineal parenchymal tumors and proposed a consensus nomenclature for disease groups, laying the groundwork for future studies as well as routine use in tumor diagnostic classification and clinical trial stratification.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultBrain NeoplasmsChildChild, PreschoolCohort StudiesDNA MethylationFemaleGenome-Wide Association StudyHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMaleMiddle AgedPineal GlandPinealomaConsensusDNA methylation profilingMolecular groupsPineal parenchymal tumors of intermediate differentiationPineoblastomaRisk-stratification

Identifiers

PMID33619588
PMCPMC9302019
OpenAlexW3130118722

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.