Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33619373›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Molecular cell biology2021

Direct cell reprogramming: approaches, mechanisms and progress.

Haofei Wang, Yuchen Yang, Jiandong Liu, Li Qian

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 288 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
288citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

288 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. SEC Mediates mAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The metabolic road from α-cells to β-cells.Nature chemical biology · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

228 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Haofei WangDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8914-442X
Yuchen YangDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Jiandong LiuDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Li QianDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA. li_qian@med.unc.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7614-5618

Funding

The role of RNA-binding protein Lin28a in hypertrophic cardiomyopathyR01HL139976 · NHLBI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI LIU, JIANDONG · 2019 to 2022
$2.1M
Molecular mechanisms of direct cardiac reprogrammingR01HL128331 · NHLBI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI QIAN, LI · 2016 to 2020
$2.1M
Molecular regulation of ventricular chamber maturationR01HL139880 · NHLBI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI LIU, JIANDONG · 2018 to 2022
$2.0M
Understanding Human Cardiomyocyte Fate AcquisitionR01HL144551 · NHLBI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI QIAN, LI · 2019 to 2020
$923k
Molecular regulation of ventricular maturationR56HL133081 · NHLBI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI LIU, JIANDONG · 2017 to 2017
$389k
American Heart Association-American Stroke Association 18TPA34180058NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL128331NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL139880NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL139976NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL144551NHLBI NIH HHS R56 HL133081
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The reprogramming of somatic cells with defined factors, which converts cells from one lineage into cells of another, has greatly reshaped our traditional views on cell identity and cell fate determination. Direct reprogramming (also known as transdifferentiation) refers to cell fate conversion without transitioning through an intermediary pluripotent state. Given that the number of cell types that can be generated by direct reprogramming is rapidly increasing, it has become a promising strategy to produce functional cells for therapeutic purposes. This Review discusses the evolution of direct reprogramming from a transcription factor-based method to a small-molecule-driven approach, the recent progress in enhancing reprogrammed cell maturation, and the challenges associated with in vivo direct reprogramming for translational applications. It also describes our current understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying direct reprogramming, including the role of transcription factors, epigenetic modifications, non-coding RNAs, and the function of metabolic reprogramming, and highlights novel insights gained from single-cell omics studies.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell DifferentiationCell TransdifferentiationCellular ReprogrammingEpigenesis, GeneticHumans

Identifiers

PMID33619373
PMCPMC8161510

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.