Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33619351›Full record

ArticleCommunications biology2021

Annotation of chromatin states in 66 complete mouse epigenomes during development.

Arjan van der Velde, Kaili Fan, Junko Tsuji, Jill E Moore, Michael J Purcaro, Henry E Pratt, Zhiping Weng

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed, 83 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Functional genomic analysis of non-canonical DNA regulatory elements of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor.Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Arjan van der VeldeProgram in Bioinformatics and Integrative Biology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1086-0859
Kaili FanProgram in Bioinformatics and Integrative Biology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8723-7902
Junko TsujiProgram in Bioinformatics and Integrative Biology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA.
Jill E MooreProgram in Bioinformatics and Integrative Biology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3023-0806
Michael J PurcaroProgram in Bioinformatics and Integrative Biology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4735-4215
Henry E PrattProgram in Bioinformatics and Integrative Biology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA.
Zhiping WengProgram in Bioinformatics and Integrative Biology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA. zhiping.weng@umassmed.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3032-7966
University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School · USBoston University · US

Funding

EDAC: ENCODE Data Analysis CenterU24HG009446 · NHGRI · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI GERSTEIN, MARK BENDER, WENG, ZHIPING · 2017 to 2022
$10.4M
EDAC: ENCODE Data Analysis CenterU41HG007000 · NHGRI · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI WENG, ZHIPING · 2012 to 2016
$9.8M
NHGRI NIH HHS U24 HG009446NHGRI NIH HHS U41 HG007000
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The morphologically and functionally distinct cell types of a multicellular organism are maintained by their unique epigenomes and gene expression programs. Phase III of the ENCODE Project profiled 66 mouse epigenomes across twelve tissues at daily intervals from embryonic day 11.5 to birth. Applying the ChromHMM algorithm to these epigenomes, we annotated eighteen chromatin states with characteristics of promoters, enhancers, transcribed regions, repressed regions, and quiescent regions. Our integrative analyses delineate the tissue specificity and developmental trajectory of the loci in these chromatin states. Approximately 0.3% of each epigenome is assigned to a bivalent chromatin state, which harbors both active marks and the repressive mark H3K27me3. Highly evolutionarily conserved, these loci are enriched in silencers bound by polycomb repressive complex proteins, and the transcription start sites of their silenced target genes. This collection of chromatin state assignments provides a useful resource for studying mammalian development.

Indexed as

Chromatin Assembly and DisassemblyEpigenesis, GeneticEpigenomeAnimalsBinding SitesDNA MethylationEpigenomicsGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalGestational AgeHistonesMiceMice, Inbred C57BLPolycomb Repressive Complex 2Promoter Regions, GeneticHistonesPolycomb Repressive Complex 2

Identifiers

PMID33619351
PMCPMC7900196
OpenAlexW3133455019

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.