Was enough, and is enough, being done to protect the primary care workforce from COVID-19?

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Family physicians' responses to personal protective equipment shortages in four regions in Canada: a qualitative study.BMC primary care · 2023
   Article
2. Was enough, and is enough, being done to protect the primary care workforce from COVID-19?The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2021
   Article
3. Supporting Primary Care Professionals to Stay in Work During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Views on Personal Risk and Access to Testing During the First Wave of Pandemic in Europe.Frontiers in medicine · 2021
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Commented on by
  Was enough, and is enough, being done to protect the primary care workforce from COVID-19?2021

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as