Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33619039›Full record

SynthesisBMJ global health2021

Weaponised uranium and adverse health outcomes in Iraq: a systematic review.

Shelby Surdyk, Moustapha Itani, Mais Al-Lobaidy, Lara A Kahale, Aida Farha, Omar Dewachi, Elie A Akl, Rima R Habib

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMJ global health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Characterization of Uranyl (UOACS chemical neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. The Janus face of uranium in toxicology.Archives of toxicology · 2022
    Article
  8. Cancer diagnosis in areas of conflict.Frontiers in oncology · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Shelby SurdykDepartment of Environmental Health, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon.
Moustapha ItaniNature Conservation Centre, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon.
Mais Al-LobaidyDepartment of Environmental Health, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon.
Lara A KahaleClinical Research Institute, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon.
Aida FarhaSaab Medical Library, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon.
Omar DewachiDepartment of Anthropology, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA.
Elie A AklDepartment of Internal Medicine, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon.
Rima R HabibDepartment of Environmental Health, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon rima.habib@aub.edu.lb.ORCID 0000-0001-6280-7238

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe US military first deployed depleted uranium (DU) weapons in Iraq during the Gulf War in 1990 and in the 2003 invasion of Iraq. Research into the health impacts of DU has been mired in debate and controversy. Research funded by the US government has denied the health risks posed by DU to the Iraqi population, while opponents have claimed that DU is responsible for increased rates of birth defects and cancers in Iraq. Others assert that the public health impacts of DU weapons remain uncertain. This systematic review identified, appraised and synthesised all human observational studies assessing adverse health outcomes associated with DU exposure among the Iraqi population. To our knowledge, no systematic review has been conducted on the topic previously.

methodsWe searched 11 electronic databases for human observational studies published between 1990 and 2020 that measured association between exposure to weaponised uranium and health outcomes (including cancer, birth defects, immune system function and mortality) among the Iraqi population. We assessed risk of bias using the Navigation Guide's risk of bias tool and rated certainty of the evidence using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations approach (PROSPERO: CRD42018108225).

resultsOur searches identified 2601 records, of which 28 met our inclusion criteria. We identified five additional eligible reports from other sources. Two articles reported the results of multiple relevant studies; our final set included 33 articles reporting on 36 eligible studies. Most studies (n=30, 83%) reported a positive association between uranium exposure and adverse health outcomes. However, we found that the reviewed body of evidence suffers from a high risk of bias.

conclusionThe available evidence suggests possible associations between exposure to depleted uranium and adverse health outcomes among the Iraqi population. More primary research and the release of missing data are needed to design meaningful health and policy interventions in Iraq.

Indexed as

UraniumHumansIraqOutcome Assessment, Health CarePublic HealthUraniumcancerenvironmental healthpublic healthsystematic review

Identifiers

PMID33619039
PMCPMC7903104

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.