Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33618742›Full record

ArticleCritical care (London, England)2021

Surfactant therapies for pediatric and neonatal ARDS: ESPNIC expert consensus opinion for future research steps.

Daniele De Luca, Paola Cogo, Martin C Kneyber, Paolo Biban, Malcolm Grace Semple, Jesus Perez-Gil, Giorgio Conti, Pierre Tissieres, Peter C Rimensberger

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Article in Critical care (London, England), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05002478 (Short-Term Effect of Prone Positioning in Infants With Severe Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome), which is not on this map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05002478 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Short-Term Effect of Prone Positioning in Infants With Severe Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

TypeinterventionalSponsorMedical University of ViennaRan2022 to 2027Enrolled14ConditionsAcute Lung Injury/Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS), Surfactant Dysfunction, InfantArmsProne positioning
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Case Report: Beyond commensal:Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 9 institutions in 6 countries.

Daniele De LucaDivision of Pediatrics and Neonatal Critical Care, "A.Béclère" Medical Centre, Paris Saclay University Hospitals, APHP, 157 Rue de la Porte de Trivaux, 92140, Clamart (Paris-IDF), France. dm.deluca@icloud.com.ORCID 0000-0002-3846-4834
Paola CogoDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Udine, Udine, Italy.
Martin C KneyberDivision of Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Beatrix Children's Hospital Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Paolo BibanDepartment of Neonatal and Pediatric Critical Care, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Verona, Italy.
Malcolm Grace SempleHealth Protection Research Unit in Emerging and Zoonotic Infections, Department of Clinical Infection, Microbiology and Immunology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Jesus Perez-GilDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology and Research Institute "Hospital 12 de Octubre", Complutense University, Madrid, Spain.
Giorgio ContiDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy.
Pierre TissieresDivision of Pediatric Critical Care and Neonatal Medicine, "Kremlin-Bicetre" Medical Center, Paris Saclay University Hospitals, APHP, Paris, France.
Peter C RimensbergerDivision of Neonatology and Pediatric Critical Care, Department of Pediatrics, University Hospital of Geneva, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona · ITInserm · FRResearch Institute Hospital 12 de Octubre · ESUniversità Cattolica del Sacro Cuore · ITUniversité Paris-Saclay · FRUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NLUniversity of Geneva · CHUniversity of Liverpool · GBUniversity of Udine · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pediatric (PARDS) and neonatal (NARDS) acute respiratory distress syndrome have different age-specific characteristics and definitions. Trials on surfactant for ARDS in children and neonates have been performed well before the PARDS and NARDS definitions and yielded conflicting results. This is mainly due to heterogeneity in study design reflecting historic lack of pathobiology knowledge. We reviewed the available clinical and preclinical data to create an expert consensus aiming to inform future research steps and advance the knowledge in this area. Eight trials investigated the use of surfactant for ARDS in children and ten in neonates, respectively. There were improvements in oxygenation (7/8 trials in children, 7/10 in neonates) and mortality (3/8 trials in children, 1/10 in neonates) improved. Trials were heterogeneous for patients' characteristics, surfactant type and administration strategy. Key pathobiological concepts were missed in study design. Consensus with strong agreement was reached on four statements: 1. There are sufficient preclinical and clinical data to support targeted research on surfactant therapies for PARDS and NARDS. Studies should be performed according to the currently available definitions and considering recent pathobiology knowledge. 2. PARDS and NARDS should be considered as syndromes and should be pre-clinically studied according to key characteristics, such as direct or indirect (primary or secondary) nature, clinical severity, infectious or non-infectious origin or patients' age. 3. Explanatory should be preferred over pragmatic design for future trials on PARDS and NARDS. 4. Different clinical outcomes need to be chosen for PARDS and NARDS, according to the trial phase and design, trigger type, severity class and/or surfactant treatment policy. We advocate for further well-designed preclinical and clinical studies to investigate the use of surfactant for PARDS and NARDS following these principles.

Indexed as

ChildChild, PreschoolForecastingHumansInfantInfant, NewbornPediatricsResearchRespiratory Distress SyndromeSurface-Active AgentsSurface-Active AgentsChildrenInfantNARDSNeonatePARDSSurfactant

Identifiers

PMID33618742
PMCPMC7898495
OpenAlexW3130743505

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.