Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33618723›Full record

ArticleBMC veterinary research2021

Gene expression in tonsils in swine following infection with porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus.

Qian Dong, Joan K Lunney, Kyu-Sang Lim, Yet Nguyen, Andrew S Hess, Hamid Beiki, Raymond R R Rowland, Kristen Walker, James M Reecy, Christopher K Tuggle and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC veterinary research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Qian DongDepartment of Animal Science, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, 50011, USA.
Joan K LunneyUSDA, ARS, BARC, APDL, Beltsville, MD, 20705, USA.
Kyu-Sang LimDepartment of Animal Science, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, 50011, USA.
Yet NguyenDepartment of Statistics, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, 50011, USA.
Andrew S HessDepartment of Animal Science, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, 50011, USA.
Hamid BeikiDepartment of Animal Science, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, 50011, USA.
Raymond R R RowlandCollege of Veterinary Medicine, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, 61802, USA.
Kristen WalkerUSDA, ARS, BARC, APDL, Beltsville, MD, 20705, USA.
James M ReecyDepartment of Animal Science, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, 50011, USA.
Christopher K TuggleDepartment of Animal Science, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, 50011, USA.
Jack C M DekkersDepartment of Animal Science, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, 50011, USA. jdekkers@iastate.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1557-7577
Iowa State University · USAgricultural Research Service · USUniversity of Illinois Urbana-Champaign · US

Funding

Genome Canada .National Pork Board 12-061National Pork Board (US) 14-223USDA-NIFA 2013-68004-20362
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPorcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome (PRRS) is a threat to pig production worldwide. Our objective was to understand mechanisms of persistence of PRRS virus (PRRSV) in tonsil. Transcriptome data from tonsil samples collected at 42 days post infection (dpi) were generated by RNA-seq and NanoString on 51 pigs that were selected to contrast the two PRRSV isolates used, NVSL and KS06, high and low tonsil viral level at 42 dpi, and the favorable and unfavorable genotypes at a genetic marker (WUR) for the putative PRRSV resistance gene GBP5.

resultsThe number of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) differed markedly between models with and without accounting for cell-type enrichments (CE) in the samples that were predicted from the RNA-seq data. This indicates that differences in cell composition in tissues that consist of multiple cell types, such as tonsil, can have a large impact on observed differences in gene expression. Based on both the NanoString and the RNA-seq data, KS06-infected pigs showed greater activation, or less inhibition, of immune response in tonsils at 42 dpi than NVSL-infected pigs, with and without accounting for CE. This suggests that the NVSL virus may be better than the KS06 virus at evading host immune response and persists in tonsils by weakening, or preventing, host immune responses. Pigs with high viral levels showed larger CE of immune cells than low viral level pigs, potentially to trigger stronger immune responses. Presence of high tonsil virus was associated with a stronger immune response, especially innate immune response through interferon signaling, but these differences were not significant when accounting for CE. Genotype at WUR was associated with different effects on immune response in tonsils of pigs during the persistence stage, depending on viral isolate and tonsil viral level.

conclusionsResults of this study provide insights into the effects of PRRSV isolate, tonsil viral level, and WUR genotype on host immune response and into potential mechanisms of PRRSV persistence in tonsils that could be targeted to improve strategies to reduce viral rebreaks. Finally, to understand transcriptome responses in tissues that consist of multiple cell types, it is important to consider differences in cell composition.

Indexed as

AnimalsGenotypeImmunity, InnatePalatine TonsilPorcine Reproductive and Respiratory SyndromePorcine respiratory and reproductive syndrome virusSus scrofaSwineTranscriptomeViral LoadViremiaCell compositionIsolatePersistencePigPRRSVRNA-seqTonsilsWUR

Identifiers

PMID33618723
PMCPMC7901068
OpenAlexW3133240629

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.