Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33618009›Full record

ArticleTranslational research : the journal of laboratory and clinical medicine2021

A model based on the quantification of complement C4c, CYFRA 21-1 and CRP exhibits high specificity for the early diagnosis of lung cancer.

Daniel Ajona, Ana Remirez, Cristina Sainz, Cristina Bertolo, Alvaro Gonzalez, Nerea Varo, María D Lozano, Javier J Zulueta, Miguel Mesa-Guzman, Ana C Martin and 5 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Translational research : the journal of laboratory and clinical medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Circulating proteome for pulmonary nodule malignancy.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Improving Lung Cancer Diagnosis with CT Radiomics and Serum Histoplasmosis Testing.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2023
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Improving malignancy risk prediction of indeterminate pulmonary nodules with imaging features and biomarkers.Clinica chimica acta; international journal of clinical chemistry · 2022
    Article
  19. The impact of the lung EDRN-CVC on Phase 1, 2, & 3 biomarker validation studies.Cancer biomarkers : section A of Disease markers · 2022
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Daniel AjonaProgram in Solid Tumors, Center for Applied Medical Research (CIMA), Pamplona, Spain; Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red Cáncer (CIBERONC), Madrid, Spain; Navarra's Health Research Institute (IDISNA), Pamplona, Spain; Department of Biochemistry and Genetics, School of Sciences, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.
Ana RemirezProgram in Solid Tumors, Center for Applied Medical Research (CIMA), Pamplona, Spain; Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red Cáncer (CIBERONC), Madrid, Spain; Navarra's Health Research Institute (IDISNA), Pamplona, Spain.
Cristina SainzProgram in Solid Tumors, Center for Applied Medical Research (CIMA), Pamplona, Spain; Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red Cáncer (CIBERONC), Madrid, Spain; Navarra's Health Research Institute (IDISNA), Pamplona, Spain.
Cristina BertoloProgram in Solid Tumors, Center for Applied Medical Research (CIMA), Pamplona, Spain; Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red Cáncer (CIBERONC), Madrid, Spain; Navarra's Health Research Institute (IDISNA), Pamplona, Spain.
Alvaro GonzalezNavarra's Health Research Institute (IDISNA), Pamplona, Spain; Department of Biochemistry and Genetics, School of Sciences, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain; Department of Clinical Chemistry, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.
Nerea VaroNavarra's Health Research Institute (IDISNA), Pamplona, Spain; Department of Biochemistry and Genetics, School of Sciences, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain; Department of Clinical Chemistry, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.
María D LozanoCentro de Investigación Biomédica en Red Cáncer (CIBERONC), Madrid, Spain; Navarra's Health Research Institute (IDISNA), Pamplona, Spain; Department of Pathology, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.
Javier J ZuluetaCentro de Investigación Biomédica en Red Cáncer (CIBERONC), Madrid, Spain; Navarra's Health Research Institute (IDISNA), Pamplona, Spain; Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.
Miguel Mesa-GuzmanDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.
Ana C MartinAdvanced Marker Discovery (AMADIX), Valladolid, Spain.
Rosa Perez-PalaciosAdvanced Marker Discovery (AMADIX), Valladolid, Spain.
Jose Luis Perez-GraciaCentro de Investigación Biomédica en Red Cáncer (CIBERONC), Madrid, Spain; Navarra's Health Research Institute (IDISNA), Pamplona, Spain; Department of Oncology, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.
Pierre P MassionCancer Early Detection and Prevention Initiative, Vanderbilt Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.
Luis M MontuengaProgram in Solid Tumors, Center for Applied Medical Research (CIMA), Pamplona, Spain; Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red Cáncer (CIBERONC), Madrid, Spain; Navarra's Health Research Institute (IDISNA), Pamplona, Spain; Department of Pathology, Anatomy and Physiology, School of Medicine, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.
Ruben PioProgram in Solid Tumors, Center for Applied Medical Research (CIMA), Pamplona, Spain; Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red Cáncer (CIBERONC), Madrid, Spain; Navarra's Health Research Institute (IDISNA), Pamplona, Spain; Department of Biochemistry and Genetics, School of Sciences, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain. Electronic address: rpio@unav.es.
Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Cáncer · ESClinica Universidad de Navarra · ESNavarre Institute of Health Research · ESVanderbilt University Medical Center · US

Funding

Validation of Biomarkers of Risk for the Early Detection of Lung CancerU01CA152662 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI DEPPEN, STEPHEN, GROGAN, ERIC L · 2010 to 2025
$12.8M
NCI NIH HHS U01 CA152662
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lung cancer screening detects early-stage cancers, but also a large number of benign nodules. Molecular markers can help in the lung cancer screening process by refining inclusion criteria or guiding the management of indeterminate pulmonary nodules. In this study, we developed a diagnostic model based on the quantification in plasma of complement-derived fragment C4c, cytokeratin fragment 21-1 (CYFRA 21-1) and C-reactive protein (CRP). The model was first validated in two independent cohorts, and showed a good diagnostic performance across a range of lung tumor types, emphasizing its high specificity and positive predictive value. We next tested its utility in two clinically relevant contexts: assessment of lung cancer risk and nodule malignancy. The scores derived from the model were associated with a significantly higher risk of having lung cancer in asymptomatic individuals enrolled in a computed tomography (CT)-screening program (OR = 1.89; 95% CI = 1.20-2.97). Our model also served to discriminate between benign and malignant pulmonary nodules (AUC: 0.86; 95% CI = 0.80-0.92) with very good specificity (92%). Moreover, the model performed better in combination with clinical factors, and may be used to reclassify patients with intermediate-risk indeterminate pulmonary nodules into patients who require a more aggressive work-up. In conclusion, we propose a new diagnostic biomarker panel that may dictate which incidental or screening-detected pulmonary nodules require a more active work-up.

Indexed as

Antigens, NeoplasmBiomarkers, TumorCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungCarcinoma, Small CellCohort StudiesComplement C4bC-Reactive ProteinEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansKeratin-19Lung NeoplasmsMaleModels, BiologicalMolecular Diagnostic TechniquesPeptide Fragmentsantigen CYFRA21.1Antigens, NeoplasmBiomarkers, TumorComplement C4bcomplement C4cC-Reactive ProteinKeratin-19Peptide Fragments

Identifiers

PMID33618009
PMCPMC8931205
OpenAlexW3133347861

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.