Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33617995›Full record

ReviewNeuroImage2021

Aging brain mechanics: Progress and promise of magnetic resonance elastography.

Lucy V Hiscox, Hillary Schwarb, Matthew D J McGarry, Curtis L Johnson

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in NeuroImage, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 67 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
67citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

67 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Measuring Brain Stiffness in Normal Adults According to Age and Sex Using Virtual MR Elastography: A Preliminary Study.Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

7 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Lucy V HiscoxDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Delaware, 150 Academy St. Newark, Newark, DE 19716, United States. Electronic address: lvhiscox@udel.edu.
Hillary SchwarbBeckman Institute for Advanced Science and Technology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, United States; Interdisciplinary Health Sciences Institute, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, United States.
Matthew D J McGarryThayer School of Engineering, Dartmouth College, NH, United States.
Curtis L JohnsonDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Delaware, 150 Academy St. Newark, Newark, DE 19716, United States. Electronic address: clj@udel.edu.

Funding

High-Resolution, Anisotropic MR Elastography of the BrainR01EB027577 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE · PI BAYLY, PHILIP V, JOHNSON, CURTIS L · 2019 to 2022
$2.7M
Mechanical integrity of memory systems in mild cognitive impairmentR01AG058853 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE · PI JOHNSON, CURTIS L · 2018 to 2022
$2.3M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG058853NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB027577
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neuroimaging techniques that can sensitivity characterize healthy brain aging and detect subtle neuropathologies have enormous potential to assist in the early detection of neurodegenerative conditions such as Alzheimer's disease. Magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) has recently emerged as a reliable, high-resolution, and especially sensitive technique that can noninvasively characterize tissue biomechanical properties (i.e., viscoelasticity) in vivo in the living human brain. Brain tissue viscoelasticity provides a unique biophysical signature of neuroanatomy that are representative of the composition and organization of the complex tissue microstructure. In this article, we detail how progress in brain MRE technology has provided unique insights into healthy brain aging, neurodegeneration, and structure-function relationships. We further discuss additional promising technical innovations that will enhance the specificity and sensitivity for brain MRE to reveal considerably more about brain aging as well as its potentially valuable role as an imaging biomarker of neurodegeneration. MRE sensitivity may be particularly useful for assessing the efficacy of rehabilitation strategies, assisting in differentiating between dementia subtypes, and in understanding the causal mechanisms of disease which may lead to eventual pharmacotherapeutic development.

Indexed as

AgingAnimalsBrainElasticity Imaging TechniquesHealthy AgingHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingAgingBiomarkersBrainMechanical propertiesNeuroimagingStiffness

Identifiers

PMID33617995
PMCPMC8251510

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.