Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33617589›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Evaluation of ebselen in resolving a methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection of pressure ulcers in obese and diabetic mice.

Haroon Mohammad, Nader S Abutaleb, Alexandra M Dieterly, L Tiffany Lyle, Mohamed N Seleem

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Antibacterial Activity of Ebselen.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  8. Repurposing FDA-approved sulphonamide carbonic anhydrase inhibitors for treatment ofJournal of enzyme inhibition and medicinal chemistry · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Haroon MohammadDepartment of Comparative Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-8843-8933
Nader S AbutalebDepartment of Comparative Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, United States of America.
Alexandra M DieterlyDepartment of Comparative Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, United States of America.
L Tiffany LyleDepartment of Comparative Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, United States of America.
Mohamed N SeleemDepartment of Comparative Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, United States of America.
Purdue University West Lafayette · US

Funding

Repurposing auranofin and ebselen for treatment of multidrug resistant pathogensR01AI130186 · NIAID · VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INST AND ST UNIV · PI SELEEM, MOHAMED · 2017 to 2021
$2.3M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI130186
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pressure ulcers (PUs) are a source of morbidity in individuals with restricted mobility including individuals that are obese or diabetic. Infection of PUs with pathogens, including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), impairs ulcers from healing. The present study evaluated ebselen as a topical antibacterial to treat MRSA-infected PUs. Against two different S. aureus strains, including MRSA USA300, resistance to ebselen did not emerge after 14 consecutive passages. Resistance to mupirocin emerged after only five passages. Additionally, ebselen was found to exert a modest postantibiotic effect of five hours against two MRSA strains. Ebselen was subsequently evaluated in MRSA-infected PUs in two models using obese and diabetic mice. In obese mice, topical ebselen (89.2% reduction) and oral linezolid (84.5% reduction) similarly reduced the burden of MRSA in infected PUs. However, in diabetic mice, topical ebselen (45.8% reduction in MRSA burden) was less effective. Histopathological evaluation of ulcers in diabetic mice determined that ebselen treatment resulted in fewer bacterial colonies deep within the dermis and that the treatment exhibited evidence of epithelial regeneration. Topical mupirocin was superior to ebselen in reducing MRSA burden in infected PUs both in obese (98.7% reduction) and diabetic (99.3% reduction) mice. Ebselen's antibacterial activity was negatively impacted as the bacterial inoculum was increased from 105 CFU/mL to 107 CFU/mL. These results suggest that a higher dose of ebselen, or a longer course of treatment, may be needed to achieve a similar effect as mupirocin in topically treating MRSA-infected pressure ulcers.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsAzolesDiabetes Mellitus, ExperimentalDisease Models, AnimalIsoindolesMethicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureusMiceObesityOrganoselenium CompoundsPressure UlcerStaphylococcal Skin InfectionsAnti-Bacterial AgentsAzolesebselenIsoindolesOrganoselenium Compounds

Identifiers

PMID33617589
PMCPMC7899319
OpenAlexW3130289473

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.