Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33617588›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

A knowledge, attitudes, and practices study on ticks and tick-borne diseases in cattle among farmers in a selected area of eastern Bhutan.

Jamyang Namgyal, Tenzin Tenzin, Sylvia Checkley, Tim J Lysyk, Sangay Rinchen, Ratna B Gurung, Sithar Dorjee, Isabelle Couloigner, Susan C Cork

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Jamyang NamgyalDepartment of Livestock, District Veterinary Hospital, Ministry of Agriculture and Forests, Trashigang, Bhutan.ORCID 0000-0003-4889-478X
Tenzin TenzinDepartment of Livestock, National Centre for Animal Health, Ministry of Agriculture and Forests, Thimphu, Bhutan.
Sylvia CheckleyDepartment of Ecosystem and Public Health, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Tim J LysykDepartment of Ecosystem and Public Health, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Sangay RinchenDepartment of Livestock, National Centre for Animal Health, Ministry of Agriculture and Forests, Thimphu, Bhutan.
Ratna B GurungDepartment of Livestock, National Centre for Animal Health, Ministry of Agriculture and Forests, Thimphu, Bhutan.
Sithar DorjeeKhesar Gyalpo University of Medical Sciences of Bhutan, Thimphu, Bhutan.
Isabelle CouloignerDepartment of Ecosystem and Public Health, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Susan C CorkDepartment of Ecosystem and Public Health, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-8200-3584
University of Calgary · CAMinistry of Agriculture and Forests · BTKhesar Gyalpo University of Medical Sciences of Bhutan · BT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Livestock farming plays an important role in supporting the livelihood of resource-poor subsistence farmers in Bhutan. However, ticks and tick-borne diseases (TBDs) are one of the major constraints to livestock farming due to their negative effect on health and production. To date, no study has been conducted in Bhutan to assess farmers' knowledge, attitude, and practices (KAP) about ticks and TBDs in cattle, although such information is essential in ensuring the development and adoption of effective prevention and control measures. Therefore, a KAP survey was conducted among 246 cattle owners in the Samkhar sub-district of eastern Bhutan in June 2019, using a structured questionnaire. Based on our scoring criteria, 52% [95%CI: 45.5-58.4] had adequate knowledge about ticks as potential vectors of diseases. Logistic regression analysis showed that the individuals who practiced a stall-feeding system of cattle rearing were 2.8 times [OR = 2.8 (95%CI: 1.66-4.78)] more likely to have adequate knowledge than others. Sixty-eight percent [95%CI: 62.5-74.4] had a favorable attitude toward tick prevention and control programs. Men were 1.95 times [OR = 1.95 (95%CI: 1.09-3.55)] more likely to have a favorable attitude than women, and the individuals who practiced a stall-feeding system were 2.59 times [OR = 2.59 95%CI: 1.45-4.78)] more likely to have a favorable attitude than others, after adjusting for the effect of other variables in the model. Overall, only 38% [95%CI 32.5-45] of the respondents reported tick infestation as one of the most important animal health problems, but 100% reported using acaricides to control ticks in cattle. Despite a high level of acaricide usage, the level of knowledge was low among the farmers interviewed. Findings from this study underline the importance of considering identified knowledge gaps and initiating education efforts to improve the adoption of effective tick prevention and control measures among farmers.

Indexed as

AcaricidesAdolescentAdultAnimalsBhutanCattleCattle DiseasesFarmersFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesTick-Borne DiseasesTick ControlAcaricides

Identifiers

PMID33617588
PMCPMC7899374
OpenAlexW3132542769

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.