Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33617587›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

The combination of MMSE with VSRAD and eZIS has greater accuracy for discriminating mild cognitive impairment from early Alzheimer's disease than MMSE alone.

Keita Tokumitsu, Norio Yasui-Furukori, Junko Takeuchi, Koji Yachimori, Norio Sugawara, Yoshio Terayama, Nobuyuki Tanaka, Tatsunori Naraoka, Kazutaka Shimoda

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Influences of Vitamin BNutrients · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Keita TokumitsuDepartment of Neuropsychiatry, Towada City Hospital, Towada, Aomori, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-6747-4348
Norio Yasui-FurukoriDepartment of Psychiatry, Dokkyo Medical University School of Medicine, Mibu, Tochigi, Japan.
Junko TakeuchiDepartment of Neuropsychiatry, Towada City Hospital, Towada, Aomori, Japan.
Koji YachimoriDepartment of Neuropsychiatry, Towada City Hospital, Towada, Aomori, Japan.
Norio SugawaraDepartment of Psychiatry, Dokkyo Medical University School of Medicine, Mibu, Tochigi, Japan.
Yoshio TerayamaDepartment of Radiology, Towada City Hospital, Towada, Aomori, Japan.
Nobuyuki TanakaDepartment of Radiology, Towada City Hospital, Towada, Aomori, Japan.
Tatsunori NaraokaDepartment of Radiology, Towada City Hospital, Towada, Aomori, Japan.
Kazutaka ShimodaDepartment of Psychiatry, Dokkyo Medical University School of Medicine, Mibu, Tochigi, Japan.
Towada City Hospital · JPDokkyo Medical University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlzheimer's disease (AD) is assessed by carefully examining a patient's cognitive impairment. However, previous studies reported inadequate diagnostic accuracy for dementia in primary care settings. Many hospitals use the automated quantitative evaluation method known as the Voxel-based Specific Regional Analysis System for Alzheimer's Disease (VSRAD), wherein brain MRI data are used to evaluate brain morphological abnormalities associated with AD. Similarly, an automated quantitative evaluation application called the easy Z-score imaging system (eZIS), which uses brain SPECT data to detect regional cerebral blood flow decreases associated with AD, is widely used. These applications have several indicators, each of which is known to correlate with the degree of AD. However, it is not completely known whether these indicators work better when used in combination in real-world clinical practice.

methodsWe included 112 participants with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and 128 participants with early AD in this study. All participants underwent MRI, SPECT, and the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE). Demographic and clinical characteristics were assessed by univariate analysis, and logistic regression analysis with a combination of MMSE, VSRAD and eZIS indicators was performed to verify whether the diagnostic accuracy in discriminating between MCI and early AD was improved.

resultsThe area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for the MMSE score alone was 0.835. The AUC was significantly improved to 0.870 by combining the MMSE score with two quantitative indicators from the VSRAD and eZIS that assessed the extent of brain abnormalities.

conclusionCompared with the MMSE score alone, the combination of the MMSE score with the VSRAD and eZIS indicators significantly improves the accuracy of discrimination between patients with MCI and early AD. Implementing VSRAD and eZIS does not require professional clinical experience in the treatment of dementia. Therefore, the accuracy of dementia diagnosis by physicians may easily be improved in real-world primary care settings.

Indexed as

AgedAlzheimer DiseaseBrainCerebrovascular CirculationCognitive DysfunctionFemaleHumansMaleMental Status and Dementia TestsROC CurveTomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon

Identifiers

PMID33617587
PMCPMC7899318
OpenAlexW3130855231

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.