ArticleThe American journal of clinical hypnosis2021
Common paraverbal errors during hypnosis intervention training.
Article in The American journal of clinical hypnosis, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effect of hypnotic communication on pain during arterial blood gas standardized procedures in the emergency department compared with traditional communication: a triple-blind randomized controlled trial (POPAIN study).European journal of emergency medicine : official journal of the European Society for Emergency Medicine · 2026Trial
- Real-time assessment of hypnotic depth, using an EEG-based brain-computer interface: a preliminary study.BMC research notes · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
There is growing literature to support the use of hypnosis as an evidence-based behavioral medicine intervention to manage a wide variety of symptoms and side effects associated with cancer and its treatment (e.g., pain, nausea, fatigue). However, formal training in hypnosis is often lacking among cancer care providers. The purpose of this study is to identify common paraverbal errors among hypnosis trainees in order to inform future training efforts. In a sample of 196 hypnosis trainees, paraverbal errors (i.e., tone, pacing, and phrasing) were tracked across hypnotic intervention components. Results revealed that trainees had most difficulty with hypnotic tone, particularly during the Induction, Deepening, and Alerting components. Individual trainee characteristics were unrelated to paraverbal errors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.