Is there a unique integration mechanism of Agrobacterium T-DNA into a plant genome?

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Whole-genome sequencing and comparative genomic analysis ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2026
   Article
2. Comparative evaluation of gene copy number estimation techniques in genetically modified crops: insights from Southern blotting, qPCR, dPCR and NGS.Plant biotechnology journal · 2024
   Article
3. Genomic consequences associated with Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of plants.The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology · 2024
   Review
4. Plant DNA Repair andInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2021
   Review
5. Mechanisms of Genome Maintenance in Plants: Playing It Safe With Breaks and Bumps.Frontiers in genetics · 2021
   Review

Corrections and comments

• Comment on
  Agrobacterium T-DNA integration in somatic cells does not require the activity of DNA polymerase θ.2021

Authors and funding

1 author.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as