Observational studyInternal and emergency medicine2021
Percutaneous pericardiocentesis for pericardial effusion: predictors of mortality and outcomes.
Observational study in Internal and emergency medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical, Echocardiographic, and Procedural Characteristics of Eccentric Versus Circumferential Pericardial Effusions in a Symptomatic Drainage Cohort.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- Long-term mortality and acute complications after percutaneous pericardiocentesis in cancer and noncancer patients presenting with severe pericardial effusion.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2026Article
- Etiological distribution and mortality factors in pericardial effusion: Insights from a large cohort study.Global cardiology science & practice · 2025Article
- Etiologies, fluid characteristics, and outcomes of pericardiocentesis: a five-year retrospective study from a single center.Postepy w kardiologii interwencyjnej = Advances in interventional cardiology · 2025Article
- Incidence of secondary pericardial effusions associated with different etiologies: a comprehensive review of literature.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2025Review
- Complications in Pericardiocentesis: Right Ventricular Perforation in a 75-Year-Old Patient with Lymphoma.The American journal of case reports · 2024Article
- Pericardial tamponade: a new perspective on echocardiographic features and application of a prediction score.Internal and emergency medicine · 2024Article
- Asymptomatic Chronic Large Pericardial Effusions: To Drain or to Observe?Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Article
- Cardiovascular Reasons for Access to a Tertiary Oncological Emergency Service: The CARILLON Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Clinical characteristics and risk factors of in-hospital mortality among patients undergoing percutaneous pericardiocentesis.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2023Article
- Removing pericardial drainage tube for acute cardiac tamponade associated with catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation can trigger hemoperitoneum from severe liver bleeding.HeartRhythm case reports · 2022Article
- Predictors of Recurrence and Survival in Cancer Patients With Pericardial Effusion Requiring Pericardiocentesis.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Article
- Prognostic Significance of Controlling Nutritional Status Score (CONUT) in Patients Undergoing Pericardiocentesis.Acta Cardiologica Sinica · 2022Article
- Development and validation a simple scoring system to identify malignant pericardial effusion.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pericardial effusion can dangerously precipitate patient's hemodynamic stability and requires prompt intervention in case of tamponade. We investigated potential predictors of in-hospital mortality, a composite outcome of in-hospital mortality, pericardiocentesis-related complications, and the need for emergency cardiac surgery and all-cause mortality in patients undergoing percutaneous pericardiocentesis. This is an observational, retrospective, single-center study on patients undergoing percutaneous pericardiocentesis (2010-2019). We enrolled 81 consecutive patients. Median age was 71.4 years (interquartile range [IQR] 58.1-78.1 years) and 51 (63%) were male. Most of the pericardiocentesis were performed in an urgency setting (76.5%) for cardiac tamponade (77.8%). The most common etiology was idiopathic (33.3%) followed by neoplastic (22.2%). In-hospital mortality was 14.8% while mortality during follow-up (mean 17.1 months) was 44.4%. Only hemodynamic instability (i.e., cardiogenic shock, hypotension refractory to fluid challenge therapy and inotropes) was associated with in-hospital mortality at the univariate analysis (odds ratio [OR] 7.2; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.76-29.4). Non-neoplastic/non-idiopathic etiology and hemodynamic instability were associated with the composite outcome of in-hospital mortality, need for emergency cardiac surgery, or pericardiocentesis-related complications (OR 5.75, 95% CI 1.65-20.01, and OR 5.81, 95% CI 2.11-15.97, respectively). Multivariate Cox regression analysis adjusted for possible confounding variables (age, coronary artery disease, and hemodynamic instability) showed that neoplastic etiology was independently associated with medium-term mortality (hazard ratio [HR] 4.05, 95% CI 1.45-11.36). In a real-world population treated with pericardiocentesis for pericardial effusion, in-hospital adverse outcomes and medium-term mortality are consistent, in particular for patients presenting with hemodynamic instability or neoplastic pericardial effusion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.