Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33616854›Full record

ArticleHead and neck pathology2021

Comparing Outcomes for Patients with Human Papillomavirus (HPV) Type 16 versus Other High-Risk HPV Types in Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Rachel F Shenker, Nelson H May, Joshua D Waltonen, Jae Paul Yang, Stacey S O'Neill, Bart A Frizzell, Kathryn M Greven, Ryan T Hughes

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Head and neck pathology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Advancements in immunotherapy for oropharyngeal cancer: Current landscape and future prospects.Biomedical papers of the Medical Faculty of the University Palacky, Olomouc, Czechoslovakia · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Rachel F ShenkerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA. rachel.shenker@duke.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6552-6255
Nelson H MayDepartment of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston- Salem, NC, USA.
Joshua D WaltonenDepartment of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston- Salem, NC, USA.
Jae Paul YangDepartment of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston- Salem, NC, USA.
Stacey S O'NeillDepartment of Pathology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.
Bart A FrizzellDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.
Kathryn M GrevenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.
Ryan T HughesDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.
Wake Forest University · USDuke University · US

Funding

Wake Forest Clinical and Translational Science AwardUL1TR001420 · NCATS · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI ARD, JAMY D, FOLEY, KRISTIE L · 2015 to 2023
$32.3M
Comprehensive Cancer Center at Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center UL1TR001420NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001420
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human papillomavirus (HPV)-associated oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) is related to improved treatment outcomes. What remains unclear is whether all HPV DNA genotypes carry similar prognostic relevance. We aimed to evaluate disease control and survival outcomes by HPV DNA genotype. Patients with primary OPSCC without distant metastases treated with curative intent were retrospectively identified from an IRB-approved institutional database. Patients that underwent HPV DNA polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing with available genotype were included and dichotomized by the presence of HPV type 16 (HPV-16) or other high-risk HPV genotype (HPV-non16). Overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), locoregional control (LRC) and distant control (DC) were determined using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. In our cohort of 193 patients treated from 2012 to 2018 with HPV DNA PCR, 10% were detected as HPV-non16 high-risk types. Patients with HPV-16 were significantly younger than those with HPV-non16, but no other baseline factors were associated with HPV-non16. With a median follow-up of 42.9 months, there were no significant differences in outcomes between the HPV-16 and HPV-non16 groups for 3-year OS (87.7% v. 73.6%), DFS (82.9% v. 68.7%), LRC (92.8% v. 88.5%) or DC (91% v. 89.2%). There is no statistically significant difference in outcomes between OPSCC with HPV-16 and HPV-non16 high-risk genotypes in our cohort, though trends of overall worse survival and disease-free survival in HPV-non 16 OPSCC were seen. Further studies with larger cohorts of patients with HPV-non 16-associated OPSCC are required to make definitive conclusions regarding the prognostic and clinical significance of HPV type.

Indexed as

AdultAgedFemaleGenotypeHead and Neck NeoplasmsHuman papillomavirus 16HumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMiddle AgedPapillomaviridaePapillomavirus InfectionsSquamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and NeckHead and neck neoplasmsHPV testingHuman papillomavirusOropharyngeal carcinomaSquamous cell carcinoma

Identifiers

PMID33616854
PMCPMC8384998
OpenAlexW3129273559

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.