Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33616825›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2021

Dissipation kinetics and risk assessment of iprovalicarb + propineb fungicide in tomato under different agroclimates.

Vandana Tripathy, Krishan Kumar Sharma, Thomas George, Chidanand Shiveshankar Patil, Yogesh Subhash Saindane, Soudamini Mohapatra, Lekha Siddamallaiah, Abdul Rashid Khan Pathan, Amit Kumar Yadav, Khushbu Sharma and 3 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Vandana TripathyProject Coordinating Cell, Pesticide Residue Laboratory, All India Network Project on Pesticide Residues, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, 110 012, India.
Krishan Kumar SharmaProject Coordinating Cell, Pesticide Residue Laboratory, All India Network Project on Pesticide Residues, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, 110 012, India. kksaicrp@yahoo.co.in.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5621-1603
Thomas GeorgeAll India Network Project on Pesticide Residues, Kerala Agricultural University (KAU), Vellayani, Kerala, India.
Chidanand Shiveshankar PatilAll India Network Project on Pesticide Residues, Mahatma Phule Krishi Vidyapeeth (MPKV), Rahuri, Maharashtra, India.
Yogesh Subhash SaindaneAll India Network Project on Pesticide Residues, Mahatma Phule Krishi Vidyapeeth (MPKV), Rahuri, Maharashtra, India.
Soudamini MohapatraAll India Network Project on Pesticide Residues, Indian Institute of Horticultural Research (IIHR), Bangalore, Karnataka, India.
Lekha SiddamallaiahAll India Network Project on Pesticide Residues, Indian Institute of Horticultural Research (IIHR), Bangalore, Karnataka, India.
Abdul Rashid Khan PathanAll India Network Project on Pesticide Residues, Sri Karan Narendra Agriculture University (SKNAU), Jobner, Rajasthan, India.
Amit Kumar YadavAll India Network Project on Pesticide Residues, Sri Karan Narendra Agriculture University (SKNAU), Jobner, Rajasthan, India.
Khushbu SharmaProject Coordinating Cell, Pesticide Residue Laboratory, All India Network Project on Pesticide Residues, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, 110 012, India.
Rajbir YadavProject Coordinating Cell, Pesticide Residue Laboratory, All India Network Project on Pesticide Residues, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, 110 012, India.
Ruchi GuptaProject Coordinating Cell, Pesticide Residue Laboratory, All India Network Project on Pesticide Residues, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, 110 012, India.
Suresh WaliaProject Coordinating Cell, Pesticide Residue Laboratory, All India Network Project on Pesticide Residues, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, 110 012, India.

Funding

Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR), New Delhi, India (F.No. CS.8/2/2017-IA-III)M/s Bayer Crop Science Limited, Mumbai, India ST No. 107
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multi-location supervised field trials in India were conducted with a combination pesticide formulation (iprovalicarb 5.5% + propineb 61.25%, 66.75% WP) in tomato to study dissipation behavior at single (iprovalicarb 137.5 g a.i. ha

Indexed as

Fungicides, IndustrialPesticide ResiduesSolanum lycopersicumCarbamatesChromatography, LiquidHalf-LifeHumansIndiaKineticsRisk AssessmentTandem Mass SpectrometryValineZinebCarbamatesFungicides, IndustrialiprovalicarbPesticide ResiduespropinebValineZinebConsumer risk assessmentIprovalicarbOECD MRL calculatorPropinebResidueTomato

Identifiers

PMID33616825

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.