Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33616758›Full record

ArticleJournal of anesthesia2021

The ability of pulse oximetry-derived peripheral perfusion index to detect fluid responsiveness in patients with septic shock.

Ahmed Hasanin, Nadia Karam, Ahmed M Mukhtar, Sara F Habib

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of anesthesia, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03805321 (The Validity of Peripheral Perfusion Index to Predict Fluid Responsiveness Using Mini-fluid Challenge Test), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03805321 completednot on this map

The Validity of Peripheral Perfusion Index to Predict Fluid Responsiveness Using Mini-fluid Challenge Test

TypeobservationalSponsorCairo UniversityRan2019 to 2019Enrolled57ConditionsSeptic Shock
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Early peripheral perfusion monitoring in septic shock.European journal of medical research · 2024
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ahmed HasaninDepartment of Anesthesia and Critical Care Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt. ahmed.hasanin@kasralainy.edu.eg.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9947-5863
Nadia KaramDepartment of Anesthesia and Critical Care Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.
Ahmed M MukhtarDepartment of Anesthesia and Critical Care Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.
Sara F HabibDepartment of Anesthesia and Critical Care Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.
Cairo University · EG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFluid challenge test is a widely used method for the detection of fluid responsiveness in acute circulatory failure. However, detection of the patient's response to the fluid challenge requires monitoring of cardiac output which is not feasible in many settings. We investigated whether the changes in the pulse oximetry-derived peripheral perfusion index (PPI), as a non-invasive surrogate of cardiac output, can detect fluid responsiveness using the fluid challenge test or not.

methodsWe prospectively enrolled 58 patients with septic shock on norepinephrine infusion. Fluid challenge test, using 200 mL crystalloid solution, was performed in all study subjects. All patients received an additional 300 mL crystalloid infusion to confirm fluid responsiveness. Velocity time integral (VTI) (using transthoracic echocardiography), and PPI were measured at the baseline, after 200 mL fluid challenge, and after completion of 500 mL crystalloids. Fluid responsiveness was defined by 10% increase in the VTI after completion of the 500 mL. The predictive ability of ∆PPI [Calculated as (PPI after 200 mL - baseline PPI)/baseline PPI] to detect fluid responders was obtained using the receiver operating characteristic curve.

resultsForty-two patients (74%) were fluid responders; in whom, the mean arterial pressure, the central venous pressure, the VTI, and the PPI increased after fluid administration compared to the baseline values. ∆PPI showed moderate ability to detect fluid responders [area under receiver operating characteristic curve (95% confidence interval) 0.82 (0.70-0.91), sensitivity 76%, specificity 80%, positive predictive value 92%, negative predictive value 54%, cutoff value ≥ 5%]. There was a significant correlation between ∆PPI and ∆VTI induced by the fluid challenge.

conclusion∆PPI showed moderate ability to detect fluid responsiveness in patients with septic shock on norepinephrine infusion. Increased PPI after 200 mL crystalloid challenge can detect fluid responsiveness with a positive predictive value of 92%; however, failure of the PPI to increase does not exclude fluid responsiveness. CLINICAL TRIAL IDENTIFIER: NCT03805321. Date of registration: 15 January 2019. Clinical trial registration URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03805321?term=ahmed+hasanin&rank=9 .

Indexed as

Shock, SepticCardiac OutputCrystalloid SolutionsFluid TherapyHemodynamicsHumansOximetryPerfusion IndexRespiration, ArtificialCrystalloid SolutionsFluid challengeFluid responsivenessPeripheral perfusion indexSeptic shock

Identifiers

PMID33616758
OpenAlexW3129942384

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.