ArticleJournal of anesthesia2021
The ability of pulse oximetry-derived peripheral perfusion index to detect fluid responsiveness in patients with septic shock.
Article in Journal of anesthesia, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03805321 (The Validity of Peripheral Perfusion Index to Predict Fluid Responsiveness Using Mini-fluid Challenge Test), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
The Validity of Peripheral Perfusion Index to Predict Fluid Responsiveness Using Mini-fluid Challenge Test
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- To identify normovolemia in humans: The stroke volume response to passive leg raising vs. head-down tilt.Physiological reports · 2022Trial
- Beyond macrocirculatory targets: a multimodal framework for microcirculatory and organ perfusion monitoring in sepsis.Critical care (London, England) · 2026Review
- The reliability of the plethysmographic perfusion index for detecting fluid responsiveness in critically ill patients.Journal of intensive medicine · 2026Article
- Variation of perfusion index to evaluate fluid responsiveness during the preload challenge tests: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Annals of intensive care · 2026Article
- A Novel Approach to Early Personalized Hemodynamic Resuscitation: Non-Invasive Peripheral Photoplethysmography for Identifying Predominant Vasodilatory Shock in Sepsis.Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica · 2025Article
- Feasibility study of using perfusion index to predict the timing of laryngeal mask insertion: an observational study.BMC anesthesiology · 2025Observational
- Novel noninvasive prediction for pulse pressure variation: a machine learning-based model.British journal of anaesthesia · 2025Article
- Early peripheral perfusion monitoring in septic shock.European journal of medical research · 2024Review
- Peripheral perfusion index of pulse oximetry in adult patients: a narrative review.European journal of medical research · 2024Review
- Peripheral perfusion index as a predictor of reintubation in critically ill surgical patients.BMC anesthesiology · 2024Observational
- Using the Perfusion Index for Block Success in Pediatric Patients: A Retrospective Study.Cureus · 2023Article
- Association of the perfusion index with postoperative acute kidney injury: a retrospective study.Korean journal of anesthesiology · 2023Article
- Wearable, Multimodal, Biosignal Acquisition System for Potential Critical and Emergency Applications.Emergency medicine international · 2021Article
- Plethysmographic Peripheral Perfusion Index: Could It Be a New Vital Sign?Frontiers in medicine · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFluid challenge test is a widely used method for the detection of fluid responsiveness in acute circulatory failure. However, detection of the patient's response to the fluid challenge requires monitoring of cardiac output which is not feasible in many settings. We investigated whether the changes in the pulse oximetry-derived peripheral perfusion index (PPI), as a non-invasive surrogate of cardiac output, can detect fluid responsiveness using the fluid challenge test or not.
methodsWe prospectively enrolled 58 patients with septic shock on norepinephrine infusion. Fluid challenge test, using 200 mL crystalloid solution, was performed in all study subjects. All patients received an additional 300 mL crystalloid infusion to confirm fluid responsiveness. Velocity time integral (VTI) (using transthoracic echocardiography), and PPI were measured at the baseline, after 200 mL fluid challenge, and after completion of 500 mL crystalloids. Fluid responsiveness was defined by 10% increase in the VTI after completion of the 500 mL. The predictive ability of ∆PPI [Calculated as (PPI after 200 mL - baseline PPI)/baseline PPI] to detect fluid responders was obtained using the receiver operating characteristic curve.
resultsForty-two patients (74%) were fluid responders; in whom, the mean arterial pressure, the central venous pressure, the VTI, and the PPI increased after fluid administration compared to the baseline values. ∆PPI showed moderate ability to detect fluid responders [area under receiver operating characteristic curve (95% confidence interval) 0.82 (0.70-0.91), sensitivity 76%, specificity 80%, positive predictive value 92%, negative predictive value 54%, cutoff value ≥ 5%]. There was a significant correlation between ∆PPI and ∆VTI induced by the fluid challenge.
conclusion∆PPI showed moderate ability to detect fluid responsiveness in patients with septic shock on norepinephrine infusion. Increased PPI after 200 mL crystalloid challenge can detect fluid responsiveness with a positive predictive value of 92%; however, failure of the PPI to increase does not exclude fluid responsiveness. CLINICAL TRIAL IDENTIFIER: NCT03805321. Date of registration: 15 January 2019. Clinical trial registration URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03805321?term=ahmed+hasanin&rank=9 .
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.