ArticleSurgical endoscopy2022
Video is better: why aren't we using it? A mixed-methods study of the barriers to routine procedural video recording and case review.
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Video Recording Patients for Direct Care Purposes: Systematic Review and Narrative Synthesis of International Empirical Studies and UK Professional Guidance.Journal of medical Internet research · 2023Pooled it
- What are the ethical, legal and social considerations for recording, sharing and utilizing surgical videos? A thematic analysis and framework to guide stakeholders.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- The new VBC: creating a video-based culture in general surgery residency.Surgical endoscopy · 2025Article
- A Multimodal Deep Learning Approach for Legal English Learning in Intelligent Educational Systems.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Video recording in GI endoscopy.VideoGIE : an official video journal of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy · 2025Article
- Current trends and barriers to video management and analytics as a tool for surgeon skilling.Surgical endoscopy · 2024Article
- Adoption of routine surgical video recording: a nationwide freedom of information act request across England and Wales.EClinicalMedicine · 2024Article
- Charting Tomorrow's Healthcare: A Traditional Literature Review for an Artificial Intelligence-Driven Future.Cureus · 2024Review
- Enhancing surgical performance in cardiothoracic surgery with innovations from computer vision and artificial intelligence: a narrative review.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2024Review
- Defining digital surgery: a SAGES white paper.Surgical endoscopy · 2024Article
- Simulated cardiopulmonary bypass: a high fidelity model for developing and accessing clinical perfusion skills.Advances in simulation (London, England) · 2024Article
- A novel high accuracy model for automatic surgical workflow recognition using artificial intelligence in laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair (TEP).Surgical endoscopy · 2023Article
- SAGES video acquisition framework-analysis of available OR recording technologies by the SAGES AI task force.Surgical endoscopy · 2023Article
- Computer vision in surgery: from potential to clinical value.NPJ digital medicine · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionVideo-based case review for minimally invasive surgery is immensely valuable for education and quality improvement. Video review can improve technical performance, shorten the learning curve, disseminate new procedures, and improve learner satisfaction. Despite these advantages, it is underutilized in many institutions. So far, research has focused on the benefits of video, and there is relatively little information on barriers to routine utilization.
methodsA 36-question survey was developed on video-based case review and distributed to the SAGES email list. The survey included closed and open-ended questions. Numeric responses and Likert scales were compared with t-test; open-ended responses were reviewed qualitatively through rapid thematic analysis to identify themes and sub-themes.
results642 people responded to the survey for a response rate of 11%. 584 (91%) thought video would improve the quality of educational conferences. 435 qualitative responses on the value of video were analyzed, and benefits included (1) improved understanding, (2) increased objectivity, (3) better teaching, and (4) better audience engagement. Qualitative comments regarding specific barriers to recording and editing case video identified challenges at all stages of the process, from (1) the decision to record a case, (2) starting the recording in the OR, (3) transferring and storing files, and (4) editing the file. Each step had its own specific challenges.
conclusionMinimally invasive surgeons want to increase their utilization of video-based case review, but there are multiple practical challenges to overcome. Understanding these barriers is essential in order to increase use of video for education and quality improvement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
33616730What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.