Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33616715›Full record

ReviewAesthetic plastic surgery2021

The Effect of Photobiomodulation on Human Mesenchymal Cells: A Literature Review.

Hernán Pinto, Paloma Goñi Oliver, Elena Sánchez-Vizcaíno Mengual

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Effects of hypoxic and photobiomodulation preconditioning on mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomes: an in vitro study with an osteogenic potential approach.Photochemical & photobiological sciences : Official journal of the European Photochemistry Association and the European Society for Photobiology · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Combined Light and Thermal Stimulation of Bone Marrow Stem Cells.Journal of lasers in medical sciences · 2024
    Article
  10. Laser Thermo-Photobiomodulation of Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stem Cells.Bulletin of experimental biology and medicine · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hernán PintoInstituto de Investigaciones Biomédicas i2e3, Santa Coloma de Gramenet, Barcelona, Spain.
Paloma Goñi OliverInstituto de Investigaciones Biomédicas i2e3, Santa Coloma de Gramenet, Barcelona, Spain.
Elena Sánchez-Vizcaíno MengualInstituto de Investigaciones Biomédicas i2e3, Santa Coloma de Gramenet, Barcelona, Spain. esanchez@i2e3.com.ORCID 0000-0002-9545-5547

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMesenchymal stem cell-based therapy is known to have the potential to induce angiogenesis. However, there are still some limitations regarding their clinical application. Photomodulation/photobiomodulation is non-invasive and non-toxic phototherapy able to stimulate cell viability, proliferation, differentiation, and migration, when the right irradiation parameters are applied. A review of the published articles on human conditioned-by-photobiomodulation mesenchymal cells in an in vitro set up was carried out. Our aim was to describe the studies' results and identify any possible tendency that might highlight the most suitable procedures.

methodsA search in English of the PubMed database was carried out with the search criteria: photobiomodulation or photoactivation or photomodulation, and mesenchymal cells. All irradiations applied in vitro, on human mesenchymal cells, with wavelengths ranged from 600 to 1000 nm.

resultsThe search yielded 42 original articles and five reviews. Finally, 37 articles were selected with a total of 43 procedures. Three procedures (7.0%) from 620 to 625 nm; 26 procedures (60.5%) from 625 to 740 nm; 13 procedures (30.2%) from 740 to 1000 nm; and one procedure (2.3%) with combinations of wavelengths. Of the 43 procedures, 14 assessed cell viability (n = 14/43, 32.6%); 34 cell proliferation (n = 34/43, 79.1%); 19 cell differentiation (n = 19/43, 44.2%); and three cell migration (n = 3/43, 7.0%).

conclusionsPhotobiomodulation is a promising technology that can impact on cell viability, differentiation, proliferation, or migration, leading to enhance its regenerative capacity. NO LEVEL ASSIGNED: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each submission to which Evidence-Based Medicine rankings are applicable. This excludes Review Articles, Book Reviews, and manuscripts that concern Basic Science, Animal Studies, Cadaver Studies, and Experimental Studies. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Indexed as

PhototherapyStem Cell TransplantationAnimalsCell ProliferationCell SurvivalHumansCell conditioningCell regenerationIrradiationLow-level laserMesenchymal cellsPhotobiomodulation

Identifiers

PMID33616715

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.