ReviewDer Orthopade2021
[Musculoskeletal laboratory diagnostics in competitive sport].
Review in Der Orthopade, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- Amelioration of contusion-induced muscle injury via regulation of the NLRP3 inflammasome.International journal of medical sciences · 2026Article
- Plasma Lipidomics and Proteomics Analyses Pre- and Post-5000 m Race in Yili Horses.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
- Blood-Based Markers for Skeletal and Cardiac Muscle Function in Eventing Horses before and after Cross-Country Rides and How They Are Influenced by Plasma Volume Shift.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023Article
- Impact of Antarctic krill oil supplementation on skeletal muscle injury recovery after resistance exercise.European journal of nutrition · 2023Article
- Key concepts in muscle regeneration: muscle "cellular ecology" integrates a gestalt of cellular cross-talk, motility, and activity to remodel structure and restore function.European journal of applied physiology · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLaboratory diagnostics represent a valuable tool for the optimization and assessment of the performance and regeneration ability in professional athletes. Blood parameters play an important role in the prevention, diagnosis and rehabilitation of injuries and physical overload.
objectivesThe aim of this article is to present an overview of musculoskeletal laboratory parameters and to provide relevant information for the medical care of competitive athletes.
methodsLiterature search and narrative review.
resultsThe laboratory assessment of bone metabolism includes vitamin D, calcium and bone turnover and aims to provide a preventive benefit with respect to skeletal complications (e.g., to minimize the risk of bone stress injuries). In addition, muscular serum markers, such as lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), creatine kinase (CK), myoglobin and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) can be used to monitor metabolic adaptation to physical exercise and to obtain information about the muscular workload and potential damage. The energy availability can be estimated and optimized by appropriate balancing and laboratory determination of macro- and micronutrients.
conclusionsLaboratory diagnostics have a clinical relevance across different sport disciplines. They are intended to support athletes and medical staff on their way to the highest possible performance and help to ensure the optimal prevention of bone and muscle injuries. Parameters with deficiency results (e.g., vitamin D) should be adequately compensated. A periodization of the laboratory tests, with at least two tests per year, and the establishment of individual variability and reference ranges can improve the assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.