Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33616701›Full record

ReviewDer Orthopade2021

[Musculoskeletal laboratory diagnostics in competitive sport].

Maximilian M Delsmann, Julian Stürznickel, Michael Amling, Peter Ueblacker, Tim Rolvien

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Der Orthopade, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Maximilian M DelsmannInstitut für Osteologie und Biomechanik, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Deutschland.
Julian StürznickelInstitut für Osteologie und Biomechanik, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Deutschland.
Michael AmlingInstitut für Osteologie und Biomechanik, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Deutschland.
Peter UeblackerPraxis für Orthopädie und Sportmedizin, München, Deutschland.
Tim RolvienFachbereich Orthopädie, Klinik und Poliklinik für Unfallchirurgie und Orthopädie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246, Hamburg, Deutschland. t.rolvien@uke.de.
University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf · DEOrthopädische Praxis · DEUniversität Hamburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLaboratory diagnostics represent a valuable tool for the optimization and assessment of the performance and regeneration ability in professional athletes. Blood parameters play an important role in the prevention, diagnosis and rehabilitation of injuries and physical overload.

objectivesThe aim of this article is to present an overview of musculoskeletal laboratory parameters and to provide relevant information for the medical care of competitive athletes.

methodsLiterature search and narrative review.

resultsThe laboratory assessment of bone metabolism includes vitamin D, calcium and bone turnover and aims to provide a preventive benefit with respect to skeletal complications (e.g., to minimize the risk of bone stress injuries). In addition, muscular serum markers, such as lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), creatine kinase (CK), myoglobin and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) can be used to monitor metabolic adaptation to physical exercise and to obtain information about the muscular workload and potential damage. The energy availability can be estimated and optimized by appropriate balancing and laboratory determination of macro- and micronutrients.

conclusionsLaboratory diagnostics have a clinical relevance across different sport disciplines. They are intended to support athletes and medical staff on their way to the highest possible performance and help to ensure the optimal prevention of bone and muscle injuries. Parameters with deficiency results (e.g., vitamin D) should be adequately compensated. A periodization of the laboratory tests, with at least two tests per year, and the establishment of individual variability and reference ranges can improve the assessment.

Indexed as

SportsVitamin D DeficiencyAthletesHumansLaboratoriesVitamin DVitamin DBiomarkerProfessional athletesRegenerationStress fracturesVitamin D

Identifiers

PMID33616701
PMCPMC8416848
OpenAlexW3131171855

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.