Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33616652›Full record

Trial reportBlood advances2021

Addition of lenalidomide to intensive treatment in younger and middle-aged adults with newly diagnosed AML: the HOVON-SAKK-132 trial.

Bob Löwenberg, Thomas Pabst, Johan Maertens, Patrycja Gradowska, Bart J Biemond, Olivier Spertini, Edo Vellenga, Laimonas Griskevicius, Lidwine W Tick, Mojca Jongen-Lavrencic and 38 more

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Blood advances, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed
7.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Epidemiology, Risk Factors, and Outcomes of Neutropenic Enterocolitis in Onco-Hematological Patients According to Chemotherapy Regimen.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Cancers · 2025
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Acute Myeloid Leukemia-Use of Measurable Residual Disease to Improve Outcomes.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

48 authors at 20 institutions in 8 countries.

Bob LöwenbergErasmus University Medical Center (MC) and Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Thomas PabstInselspital, Bern, Switzerland.
Johan MaertensUniversity Hospital Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium.
Patrycja GradowskaDutch-Belgian Hemato-Oncology Cooperative Group Data Center-Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Bart J BiemondAmsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Olivier SpertiniLausanne University Hospital (Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois), University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland.
Edo VellengaUniversity Medical Center, University Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Laimonas GriskeviciusVilnius University Hospital Santaros Klinikos and Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania.
Lidwine W TickMaxima Medisch Centrum, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Mojca Jongen-LavrencicErasmus University Medical Center (MC) and Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Marinus van Marwijk KooyIsala Hospital, Zwolle, The Netherlands.
Marie-Christiane VekemansUniversity Hospital Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium.
Walter J F M van der VeldenRadboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Berna BeverlooDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Erasmus University MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Lucienne MichauxCenter for Human Genetics, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven and University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Carlos GrauxUniversité Catholique de Louvain Namur (Godinne), Yvoir, Belgium.
Dries DeerenAZ Delta, Roeselare, Belgium.
Okke de WeerdtSt Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands.
Joost W J van EsserAmphia Hospital, Breda, The Netherlands.
Mario BargetziKantonsspittal, Arau, Switzerland.
Saskia K KleinMeander Medical Center, Amersfoort, The Netherlands.
Alain GadisseurUniversity Hospital Antwerpen, Edegem, Belgium.
Peter E WesterweelAlbert Schweitzer Hospital, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
Hendrik VeelkenUniversity Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Michael GregorLuzerner Kantonsspittal, Lucerne, Switzerland.
Tobias SilzleKantonsspittal, St Gallen, Switzerland.
Daniëlle van Lammeren-VenemaHaga Hospital, The Hague, The Netherlands.
Ine MoorsUniversity Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
Dimitri A BreemsZiekenhuis Netwerk Antwerpen, Antwerp, Belgium.
Mels HoogendoornMedisch Spectrum Leeuwarden, Leeuwarden, The Netherlands.
Marie-Cecile J C LegdeurMedisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.
Thomas FischerOtto von Guericke University Hospital Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.
Juergen KuballUniversity Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Jan CornelissenErasmus University Medical Center (MC) and Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Kimmo PorkkaHelsinki University Hospital Cancer Center, Helsinki, Finland.
Gunnar JuliussonSkanes University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.
Peter MeyerStavanger University Hospital-Rogaland, Stavanger, Norway.
Martin HöglundUniversity Hospital Uppsala, Uppsala, Sweden.
Bjorn T GjertsenHaukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
Jeroen J W M JanssenAmsterdam Vrije Universiteit Medical Centers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Gerwin HulsUniversity Medical Center, University Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Jakob PasswegUniversity Hospital, Basel, Switzerland.
Jacqueline CloosAmsterdam Vrije Universiteit Medical Centers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Peter J M ValkErasmus University Medical Center (MC) and Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Catharina H M J van ElssenUniversity Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Markus G ManzUniversity Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland; and.
Yngvar FloisandOslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Gert J OssenkoppeleAmsterdam Vrije Universiteit Medical Centers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Amsterdam University Medical Centers · NLErasmus MC · NLRadboud University Nijmegen · NLUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NLAlbert Schweitzer Ziekenhuis · NLAmphia Ziekenhuis · NLAntwerp University Hospital · BEAZ Delta · BECliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc · BEErasmus MC Cancer Institute · NLErasmus University Rotterdam · NLGhent University Hospital · BEHaga Hospital · NLHaukeland University Hospital · NOHelsinki University Hospital · FIIsala · NLKantonsbibliothek Vadiana St.Gallen · CHKU Leuven · BELeiden University Medical Center · NLLuzerner Kantonsspital · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lenalidomide, an antineoplastic and immunomodulatory drug, has therapeutic activity in acute myeloid leukemia (AML), but definitive studies about its therapeutic utility have been lacking. In a phase 3 study, we compared 2 induction regimens in newly diagnosed patients age 18 to 65 years with AML: idarubicine-cytarabine (cycle 1) and daunorubicin and intermediate-dose cytarabine (cycle 2) without or with lenalidomide (15 mg orally on days 1-21). One final consolidation cycle of chemotherapy or autologous stem cell transplantation (auto-SCT) or allogeneic SCT (allo-SCT) was provided according to a prognostic risk and minimal residual disease (MRD)-adapted approach. Event-free survival (EFS; primary end point) and other clinical end points were assessed. A second random assignment in patients in complete response or in complete response with incomplete hematologic recovery after cycle 3 or auto-SCT involved 6 cycles of maintenance with lenalidomide (10 mg on days 1-21) or observation. In all, 392 patients were randomly assigned to the control group, and 388 patients were randomly assigned to lenalidomide induction. At a median follow-up of 41 months, the study revealed no differences in outcome between the treatments (EFS, 44% ± 2% standard error and overall survival, 54% ± 2% at 4 years for both arms) although in an exploratory post hoc analysis, a lenalidomide benefit was suggested in SRSF2-mutant AML. In relation to the previous Dutch-Belgian Hemato-Oncology Cooperative Group and Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (HOVON-SAKK) studies that used a similar 3-cycle regimen but did not pursue an MRD-guided approach, these survival estimates compare markedly more favorably. MRD status after cycle 2 lost prognostic value in intermediate-risk AML in the risk-adjusted treatment context. Maintenance with lenalidomide showed no apparent effect on relapse probability in 88 patients randomly assigned for this part of the study.

Indexed as

Hematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationLeukemia, Myeloid, AcuteAdolescentAdultAgedHumansLenalidomideMiddle AgedRemission InductionTransplantation, AutologousYoung AdultLenalidomide

Identifiers

PMID33616652
PMCPMC7903238
OpenAlexW3130902181

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.