ArticleInternational journal of systematic and evolutionary microbiology2019
Article in International journal of systematic and evolutionary microbiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- Randomized Study of Usual Care Versus Xpert ® Xpress Multiplex Vaginal Panel at the Point-of-Care for Accurate Diagnosis and Appropriate Treatment of Vaginal Infections.Sexually transmitted diseases · 2026Trial
- Comparing BD Affirm VPIII to Xpert Xpress MVP and BD MAX Vaginal Panel for the diagnosis of vaginal infections.Microbiology spectrum · 2026Article
- Involvement of Megasphaera in the oral microbiome and dyslipidemia onset: evidence from a community-based study in Japan.Folia microbiologica · 2026Article
- Review
- Article
- Review
- Association between airway microbiota and systemic inflammation markers in non-small cell lung cancer patients.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Restricted vs. ad libitum feeding during sow gestation affects piglet performance, behavior, and fecal microbiota composition.Journal of animal science · 2025Article
- Update on novel validly published and included bacterial taxa derived from human clinical specimens and taxonomic revisions published in 2023.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2024Review
- Article
- Sub-communities of the vaginal microbiota in pregnant and non-pregnant women.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2023Article
- Article
- A (Applied and environmental microbiology · 2023Article
- Update on Accepted Novel Bacterial Isolates Derived from Human Clinical Specimens and Taxonomic Revisions Published in 2020 and 2021.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2023Review
- The vaginal microbiome in women of reproductive age with healthy weight versus overweight/obesity.Obesity (Silver Spring, Md.) · 2022Article
- Article
- Differences in Vaginal Microbiota, Host Transcriptome, and Proteins in Women With Bacterial Vaginosis Are Associated With Metronidazole Treatment Response.The Journal of infectious diseases · 2021Article
- Unique roles of vaginalMicrobial genomics · 2021Article
- A specific structure and high richness characterize intestinal microbiota of HIV-exposed seronegative individuals.PloS one · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Six strictly anaerobic Gram-negative bacteria representing three novel species were isolated from the female reproductive tract. The proposed type strains for each species were designated UPII 199-6
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.