Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33615628›Full record

Trial reportCancer science2021

First-in-human study of the cancer peptide vaccine TAS0313 in patients with advanced solid tumors.

Shunsuke Kondo, Toshio Shimizu, Takafumi Koyama, Jun Sato, Satoru Iwasa, Kan Yonemori, Yutaka Fujiwara, Akihiko Shimomura, Shigehisa Kitano, Kenji Tamura and 1 more

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase IClinical Trial, Phase IIMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Cancer science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Therapeutic cancer vaccines revamping: technology advancements and pitfalls.Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology · 2021
    Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Shunsuke KondoDepartment of Experimental Therapeutics, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9565-117X
Toshio ShimizuDepartment of Experimental Therapeutics, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Takafumi KoyamaDepartment of Experimental Therapeutics, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5807-8458
Jun SatoDepartment of Experimental Therapeutics, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9249-6522
Satoru IwasaDepartment of Experimental Therapeutics, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Kan YonemoriDepartment of Experimental Therapeutics, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7624-7611
Yutaka FujiwaraDepartment of Experimental Therapeutics, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6981-0800
Akihiko ShimomuraDepartment of Breast and Medical Oncology, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2557-8170
Shigehisa KitanoDepartment of Experimental Therapeutics, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Kenji TamuraDepartment of Breast and Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3514-9927
Noboru YamamotoDepartment of Experimental Therapeutics, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0787-2851

Funding

Taiho Pharmaceutical
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

TAS0313, a novel cancer vaccine cocktail, was developed to overcome the disadvantages of previously developed short and long peptide vaccines; it comprises several long peptides targeting multiple cancer antigens. We evaluated TAS0313 monotherapy in Japanese patients with advanced solid tumors for which no other therapies were available. In the dose-finding cohort, patients received TAS0313 (9 or 27 mg) on days 1, 8, and 15 of cycles 1 and 2, and then on day 1 of each subsequent 21-day cycle. The primary objective was the evaluation of safety and tolerability. Secondary objectives were evaluation of efficacy, tumor responses, and immune activation (CTL, IgG, and tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte [TIL] levels). The full analysis set contained 10 patients in the 9-mg group and seven in the 27-mg group. No dose-limiting toxicities were reported in cycle 1. All adverse drug reactions (ADRs) were grade 1 or 2; the most common ADRs were injection site-related events. The best response was stable disease in four of 17 patients. The median progression-free survival (PFS) duration was 2.2 (95% confidence interval, 1.0-2.3) months overall; patients with baseline low lymphocyte counts (≤750/μL) had shorter PFS. Compared with baseline, TILs were increased in five patients. Although CTLs, IgG, and TILs were induced, no correlative pattern with clinical outcomes was observed. The safety, tolerability, and induction of immune responses in patients with advanced solid tumors receiving TAS0313 were confirmed. Further evaluation of TAS0313's efficacy as monotherapy or in combination with pembrolizumab is underway. The study is registered at www.clinicaltrials.jp (JapicCTI-183824).

Indexed as

AgedAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCancer VaccinesCohort StudiesDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsFemaleHumansImmunoglobulin GLymphocytes, Tumor-InfiltratingMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsPeptidesProgression-Free SurvivalAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalCancer VaccinesImmunoglobulin GpembrolizumabPeptidesVaccines, Subunitadvanced solid tumorcancer peptide vaccineefficacyphase I studysafety

Identifiers

PMID33615628
PMCPMC8019195

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.