Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33615597›Full record

ArticleMolecular ecology2021

Complex histories of gene flow and a mitochondrial capture event in a nonsister pair of birds.

Michael J Andersen, Jenna M McCullough, Ethan F Gyllenhaal, Xena M Mapel, Tri Haryoko, Knud A Jønsson, Leo Joseph

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular ecology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Mitogenomics inMicrobial genomics · 2026
    Article
  3. Efficient amplicon panels for evaluating hybridization and genetic structure in the Schistosoma haematobium species group.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Telomeric assemblies ofbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Michael J AndersenDepartment of Biology and Museum of Southwestern Biology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7220-5588
Jenna M McCulloughDepartment of Biology and Museum of Southwestern Biology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7664-3868
Ethan F GyllenhaalDepartment of Biology and Museum of Southwestern Biology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0835-8520
Xena M MapelDepartment of Biology and Museum of Southwestern Biology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7501-578X
Tri HaryokoMuseum Zoologicum Bogoriense, Research Centre for Biology, Indonesian Institute of Sciences (LIPI), Cibinong, Indonesia.
Knud A JønssonNatural History Museum of Denmark, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen Ø, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-1875-9504
Leo JosephAustralian National Wildlife Collection, CSIRO National Research Collections, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7564-1978

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hybridization, introgression, and reciprocal gene flow during speciation, specifically the generation of mitonuclear discordance, are increasingly observed as parts of the speciation process. Genomic approaches provide insight into where, when, and how adaptation operates during and after speciation and can measure historical and modern introgression. Whether adaptive or neutral in origin, hybridization can cause mitonuclear discordance by placing the mitochondrial genome of one species (or population) in the nuclear background of another species. The latter, introgressed species may eventually have its own mtDNA replaced or "captured" by other species across its entire geographical range. Intermediate stages in the capture process should be observable. Two nonsister species of Australasian monarch-flycatchers, Spectacled Monarch (Symposiachrus trivirgatus) mostly of Australia and Indonesia and Spot-winged Monarch (S. guttula) of New Guinea, present an opportunity to observe this process. We analysed thousands of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) derived from ultraconserved elements of all subspecies of both species. Mitochondrial DNA sequences of Australian populations of S. trivirgatus form two paraphyletic clades, one being sister to and presumably introgressed by S. guttula despite little nuclear signal of introgression. Population genetic analyses (e.g., tests for modern and historical gene flow and selection) support at least one historical gene flow event between S. guttula and Australian S. trivirgatus. We also uncovered introgression from the Maluku Islands subspecies of S. trivirgatus into an island population of S. guttula, resulting in apparent nuclear paraphyly. We find that neutral demographic processes, not adaptive introgression, are the most likely cause of these complex population histories. We suggest that a Pleistocene extinction of S. guttula from mainland Australia resulted from range expansion by S. trivirgatus.

Indexed as

Gene FlowPasseriformesAnimalsAustraliaDNA, MitochondrialHybridization, GeneticIndonesiaIslandsNew GuineaPhylogenyDNA, MitochondrialintrogressionMaluku Islandsmitonuclear discordanceMonarchidaeSymposiachrusultraconserved elements

Identifiers

PMID33615597
PMCPMC8252742

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.