Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33615382›Full record

ReviewJournal of medical entomology2021

Understanding Mosquito Surveillance Data for Analytic Efforts: A Case Study.

Heidi E Brown, Luigi Sedda, Chris Sumner, Elene Stefanakos, Irene Ruberto, Matthew Roach

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of medical entomology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Heidi E BrownDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8578-5510
Luigi SeddaLancaster Medical School, Lancaster University, Bailrigg Campus, Lancaster, UK.
Chris SumnerYuma County Pest Abatement District, Somerton, AZ, USA.
Elene StefanakosYuma County Pest Abatement District, Somerton, AZ, USA.
Irene RubertoArizona Department of Health Services, Office of Infectious Disease Services, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
Matthew RoachArizona Department of Health Services, Office of Environmental Health, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
Arizona Department of Health Services · USLancaster University · GBUniversity of Arizona · US

Funding

Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 212501/Z/18/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mosquito surveillance data can be used for predicting mosquito distribution and dynamics as they relate to human disease. Often these data are collected by independent agencies and aggregated to state and national level portals to characterize broad spatial and temporal dynamics. These larger repositories may also share the data for use in mosquito and/or disease prediction and forecasting models. Assumed, but not always confirmed, is consistency of data across agencies. Subtle differences in reporting may be important for development and the eventual interpretation of predictive models. Using mosquito vector surveillance data from Arizona as a case study, we found differences among agencies in how trapping practices were reported. Inconsistencies in reporting may interfere with quantitative comparisons if the user has only cursory familiarity with mosquito surveillance data. Some inconsistencies can be overcome if they are explicit in the metadata while others may yield biased estimates if they are not changed in how data are recorded. Sharing of metadata and collaboration between modelers and vector control agencies is necessary for improving the quality of the estimations. Efforts to improve sharing, displaying, and comparing vector data from multiple agencies are underway, but existing data must be used with caution.

Indexed as

Datasets as TopicMosquito ControlMosquito VectorsAnimalsArizonadata sharingdisease predictionmosquito-borne diseasevector surveillance

Identifiers

PMID33615382
PMCPMC8285009
OpenAlexW3129238457

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.