ArticleFrontiers in dentistry2020
Finite Element Analysis of Stress in Bone and Abutment-Implant Interface under Static and Cyclic Loadings.
Article in Frontiers in dentistry, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Overcoming the Biomechanical Limitations of Titanium-Zirconia Dental Implants: Rationale for a Novel Ti-PEEK-Zr Tri-Layered Concept.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026Review
- Finite Element Analysis of Peri-Implant Stress in Maxillary All-on-Four Rehabilitation: Effects of Posterior Implant Angulation and Loading Protocol.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Evaluating stress distribution and clinical success in varied dental implant designs.Bioinformation · 2026Article
- Biomechanical Effects of Ti-Base Abutment Height on the Dental Implant System: A Finite Element Analysis.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2024Article
- Three-dimensional finite element analysis of stress distribution on short implants with different bone conditions and osseointegration rates.BMC oral health · 2023Article
- Biomechanical analysis of stress around the tilted implants with different cantilever lengths in all-on-4 concept.BMC oral health · 2022Article
- Biomechanical evaluations of the long-term stability of dental implant using finite element modeling method: a systematic review.The journal of advanced prosthodontics · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThe success of implant treatment depends on many factors affecting the bone-implant, implant-abutment, and abutment-prosthesis interfaces. Stress distribution in bone plays a major role in success/failure of dental implants. This study aimed to assess the pattern of stress distribution in bone and abutment-implant interface under static and cyclic loadings using finite element analysis (FEA). MATERIALS AND
methodsIn this study, ITI implants (4.1×12 mm) placed at the second premolar site with Synocta abutments and metal-ceramic crowns were simulated using SolidWorks 2007 and ABAQUS software. The bone-implant contact was assumed to be 100%. The abutments were tightened with 35 Ncm preload torque according to the manufacturer's instructions. Static and cyclic loads were applied in axial (116 Ncm), lingual (18 Ncm), and mesiodistal (24 Ncm) directions. The maximum von Mises stress and strain values were recorded.
resultsThe maximum stress concentration was at the abutment neck during both static and cyclic loadings. Also, maximum stress concentration was observed in the cortical bone. The loading stress was higher in cyclic than static loading.
conclusionWithin the limitations of this study, it can be concluded that the level of stress in single-unit implant restorations is within the tolerable range by bone.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.