Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33615256›Full record

ArticleArthroscopy, sports medicine, and rehabilitation2021

Partial Rotator Cuff Repair for Massive Tears Rarely Require Revision Surgery.

Justin D Hallock, Douglas E Parsell, Larry D Field

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Arthroscopy, sports medicine, and rehabilitation, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Revision rates and progression to shoulder arthroplasty after arthroscopic repair of massive rotator cuff tears.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Current concepts in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.Clinics in shoulder and elbow · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Treatment Options for Massive Irreparable Rotator Cuff Tears.Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Justin D HallockMississippi Sports Medicine and Orthopaedic Center, Jackson, Mississippi, U.S.A.
Douglas E ParsellMississippi Sports Medicine and Orthopaedic Center, Jackson, Mississippi, U.S.A.
Larry D FieldMississippi Sports Medicine and Orthopaedic Center, Jackson, Mississippi, U.S.A.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo determine the significance of initial and residual rotator cuff tear defect size on the need for revision surgery or additional nonsurgical therapy, in a consecutive group of patients undergoing partial repair of massive rotator cuff tears.

methodsA retrospective chart review was carried out for all arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs performed by a single surgeon between January of 2013 and December of 2016. All patients with massive rotator cuff tears (>30 cm

resultsIn total, 1954 patients who underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair were identified. Thirty-eight of these met the inclusion criteria. Those patients undergoing revision surgery represented 5.2% (2/38) of the series and had an average initial/residual tear defect area of 45.0/7.0 cm

conclusionsThere was no relationship between residual defect size after partial repair and the need for revision surgery. Patients who returned for additional nonoperative treatment after being released from care were noted to have a statistically larger residual defect size at the time of index surgical intervention. Only 5% of patients underwent subsequent surgery at an average of more than 4 years' follow-up, suggesting that partial repair of massive rotator cuff tears can provide a durable, joint-preserving intervention. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, Therapeutic Case Series.

Identifiers

PMID33615256
PMCPMC7879165

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.