Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33615163›Full record

ArticleACS pharmacology & translational science2021

Single Cell Mass Spectrometry Quantification of Anticancer Drugs: Proof of Concept in Cancer Patients.

Ryan C Bensen, Shawna J Standke, Devon H Colby, Naga Rama Kothapalli, Anh T Le-McClain, Michael A Patten, Abhishek Tripathi, Jonathan E Heinlen, Zhibo Yang, Anthony W G Burgett

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS pharmacology & translational science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Achieving a Deeper Understanding of Drug Metabolism and Responses Using Single-Cell Technologies.Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals · 2023
    Review
  14. Single cell metabolism: current and future trends.Metabolomics : Official journal of the Metabolomic Society · 2022
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ryan C BensenDepartment of Chemistry & Biochemistry, University of Oklahoma, 101 Stephenson Parkway, Norman, Oklahoma 73019, United States.
Shawna J StandkeDepartment of Chemistry & Biochemistry, University of Oklahoma, 101 Stephenson Parkway, Norman, Oklahoma 73019, United States.
Devon H ColbyDepartment of Chemistry & Biochemistry, University of Oklahoma, 101 Stephenson Parkway, Norman, Oklahoma 73019, United States.
Naga Rama KothapalliDepartment of Chemistry & Biochemistry, University of Oklahoma, 101 Stephenson Parkway, Norman, Oklahoma 73019, United States.
Anh T Le-McClainDepartment of Chemistry & Biochemistry, University of Oklahoma, 101 Stephenson Parkway, Norman, Oklahoma 73019, United States.
Michael A PattenOklahoma Biological Survey, University of Oklahoma, 111 E. Chesapeake Street, Norman, Oklahoma 73019, United States.
Abhishek TripathiStephenson Cancer Center, Section of Hematology Oncology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center; 800 NE 10th Street, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73104, United States.
Jonathan E HeinlenDepartment of Urology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, 920 Stanton L. Young Boulevard, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73104, United States.
Zhibo YangDepartment of Chemistry & Biochemistry, University of Oklahoma, 101 Stephenson Parkway, Norman, Oklahoma 73019, United States.
Anthony W G BurgettDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, 1110 N. Stonewall Avenue, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73117, United States.
University of Oklahoma · USUniversity of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center · USOklahoma Biological Survey · US

Funding

From Single Cells to Tissues: a Novel Mass Spectrometry Approach for BioanalysisR01GM116116 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA · PI YANG, ZHIBO · 2015 to 2019
$1.5M
Mass Spectrometry Detection of Drugs in Single Bladder Cancer Cells from PatientsR21CA204706 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA · PI BURGETT, ANTHONY WG · 2016 to 2018
$599k
NCI NIH HHS R21 CA204706NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM116116
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In clinical cancer medicine, the current inability to quantify intracellular chemotherapy drug concentrations in individual human cells limits the personalization and overall effectiveness of drug administration. New bioanalytical methods capable of real-time measurement of drug levels in live single cancer cells would allow for more adaptive and personalized administration of chemotherapy drugs, potentially leading to better clinical outcomes with fewer side effects. In this study, we report the development of a new quantitative single cell mass spectrometry (qSCMS) method capable of providing absolute drug amounts and concentrations in single cancer cells. Using this qSCMS system, quantitative analysis of the intracellular drug gemcitabine present in individual bladder cancer cells is reported, including in bladder cancer cells isolated from patients undergoing standard-of-care gemcitabine chemotherapy. The development of single cell pharmacology bioanalytical methods can potentially lead to more effective and safely administered drug medications in patients, especially in the treatment of cancer.

Identifiers

PMID33615163
PMCPMC7887743
OpenAlexW3120253918

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.