Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33615120›Full record

ArticleDigital biomarkers

Computer Vision-Based Assessment of Motor Functioning in Schizophrenia: Use of Smartphones for Remote Measurement of Schizophrenia Symptomatology.

Anzar Abbas, Vijay Yadav, Emma Smith, Elizabeth Ramjas, Sarah B Rutter, Caridad Benavidez, Vidya Koesmahargyo, Li Zhang, Lei Guan, Paul Rosenfield and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Digital biomarkers. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Anzar AbbasAiCure, LLC, New York, New York, USA.
Vijay YadavAiCure, LLC, New York, New York, USA.
Emma SmithIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.
Elizabeth RamjasIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.
Sarah B RutterIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.
Caridad BenavidezIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.
Vidya KoesmahargyoAiCure, LLC, New York, New York, USA.
Li ZhangAiCure, LLC, New York, New York, USA.
Lei GuanAiCure, LLC, New York, New York, USA.
Paul RosenfieldIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.
Mercedes Perez-RodriguezIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.
Isaac R Galatzer-LevyAiCure, LLC, New York, New York, USA.
AiCure (United States) · USIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionMotor abnormalities have been shown to be a distinct component of schizophrenia symptomatology. However, objective and scalable methods for assessment of motor functioning in schizophrenia are lacking. Advancements in machine learning-based digital tools have allowed for automated and remote "digital phenotyping" of disease symptomatology. Here, we assess the performance of a computer vision-based assessment of motor functioning as a characteristic of schizophrenia using video data collected remotely through smartphones.

methodsEighteen patients with schizophrenia and 9 healthy controls were asked to remotely participate in smartphone-based assessments daily for 14 days. Video recorded from the smartphone front-facing camera during these assessments was used to quantify the Euclidean distance of head movement between frames through a pretrained computer vision model. The ability of head movement measurements to distinguish between patients and healthy controls as well as their relationship to schizophrenia symptom severity as measured through traditional clinical scores was assessed.

resultsThe rate of head movement in participants with schizophrenia (1.48 mm/frame) and those without differed significantly (2.50 mm/frame;

conclusionsRemote, smartphone-based assessments were able to capture meaningful visual behavior for computer vision-based objective measurement of head movement. The measurements of head movement acquired were able to accurately classify schizophrenia diagnosis and quantify symptom severity in patients with schizophrenia.

Indexed as

Digital phenotypingHead movementMotor functionSchizophrenia

Identifiers

PMID33615120
PMCPMC7879301
OpenAlexW3122559760

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.